t;sle...@google.com>; Jeff Ward <jw...@bdo.com>
Cc: CA/Browser Forum Public Discussion List <public@cabforum.org>
Subject: RE: [cabfpub] Applicability of BRs to Client Authentication
certificates
It’s a good time to do it, too, since after governance reform, we want to be
able
To: Jeff Ward <jw...@bdo.com>
Cc: Tim Hollebeek <tim.holleb...@digicert.com>; CA/Browser Forum Public
Discussion List <public@cabforum.org>
Subject: Re: [cabfpub] Applicability of BRs to Client Authentication
certificates
On Thu, Apr 12, 2018 at 1:45 PM, Jeff Ward <jw..
On Thu, Apr 12, 2018 at 1:45 PM, Jeff Ward wrote:
> If 7.1.2.3.f is ignored, it is less confusing, but there is still
> potential ambiguity as to what ‘authenticating a server accessible through
> the Internet’ means. It would be best if the BRs clearly specified the
> technical
ublic
Discussion List <public@cabforum.org>; Ryan Sleevi <sle...@google.com>; Jeff
Ward <jw...@bdo.com>
Subject: RE: [cabfpub] Applicability of BRs to Client Authentication
certificates
… even WITHOUT 7.1.2.3.f …
From: Public [mailto:public-boun...@cabforum.org] On Behalf Of