Re: [cabfpub] Applicability of BRs to Client Authentication certificates

2018-04-12 Thread Jeff Ward via Public
t;sle...@google.com>; Jeff Ward <jw...@bdo.com> Cc: CA/Browser Forum Public Discussion List <public@cabforum.org> Subject: RE: [cabfpub] Applicability of BRs to Client Authentication certificates It’s a good time to do it, too, since after governance reform, we want to be able

Re: [cabfpub] Applicability of BRs to Client Authentication certificates

2018-04-12 Thread Tim Hollebeek via Public
To: Jeff Ward <jw...@bdo.com> Cc: Tim Hollebeek <tim.holleb...@digicert.com>; CA/Browser Forum Public Discussion List <public@cabforum.org> Subject: Re: [cabfpub] Applicability of BRs to Client Authentication certificates On Thu, Apr 12, 2018 at 1:45 PM, Jeff Ward <jw..

Re: [cabfpub] Applicability of BRs to Client Authentication certificates

2018-04-12 Thread Ryan Sleevi via Public
On Thu, Apr 12, 2018 at 1:45 PM, Jeff Ward wrote: > If 7.1.2.3.f is ignored, it is less confusing, but there is still > potential ambiguity as to what ‘authenticating a server accessible through > the Internet’ means. It would be best if the BRs clearly specified the > technical

Re: [cabfpub] Applicability of BRs to Client Authentication certificates

2018-04-12 Thread Jeff Ward via Public
ublic Discussion List <public@cabforum.org>; Ryan Sleevi <sle...@google.com>; Jeff Ward <jw...@bdo.com> Subject: RE: [cabfpub] Applicability of BRs to Client Authentication certificates … even WITHOUT 7.1.2.3.f … From: Public [mailto:public-boun...@cabforum.org] On Behalf Of