Re: [cabfpub] Voting begins: Ballot 218 version 2

2018-02-05 Thread Josh Aas via Public
t; Ministry of the Interior and Kingdom Relations (BZK) > > Wilhelmina van Pruisenweg 52 | 2595 AN | The Hague > PO Box 96810 | 2509 JE | The Hague > > > > jochem.vanden.be...@logius.nl > > http://www.logius.nl > > > > > > > > Van: Public [mailto:public-b

Re: [cabfpub] Voting begins: Ballot 218 version 2

2018-02-05 Thread Berge, J. van den (Jochem) - Logius via Public
public@cabforum.org<mailto:public@cabforum.org> Onderwerp: Re: [cabfpub] Voting begins: Ballot 218 version 2 All currently approved Domain Validation methods provide some level of assurance which is not easily quantifiable without calculating the risks (vulnerabilities, threats) of each metho

Re: [cabfpub] Voting begins: Ballot 218 version 2

2018-02-05 Thread realsky(CHT) via Public
: [cabfpub] Voting begins: Ballot 218 version 2 Buypass votes NO. There are use cases and scenarios where animproved version of method #1 for proving ownership of a domain would beappropriate. Method #1 is only to be used for OV/EV and as such theauthorization to issue the certificate must be given

Re: [cabfpub] Voting begins: Ballot 218 version 2

2018-02-05 Thread Frank Corday via Public
Trustwave votes YES to Ballot 218 version 2 From: Public > on behalf of Tim Hollebeek via Public > Reply-To: Tim Hollebeek

Re: [cabfpub] Voting begins: Ballot 218 version 2

2018-02-04 Thread Adriano Santoni via Public
Actalis "abstains". We appreciate the intent to improve the security of domain validation procedures, but we would have preferred a strengthening of Method 1 - which seemed quite possible - rather than its abolition. Adriano Il 29/01/2018 22:51, Tim Hollebeek via Public ha scritto: I’m

Re: [cabfpub] Voting begins: Ballot 218 version 2

2018-02-02 Thread cornelia.enke--- via Public
SwissSign votes No on ballot 218 Best Regards Conny From: Public < public-boun...@cabforum.org> on behalf of Tim Hollebeek via Public < public@cabforum.org> Reply-To: Tim Hollebeek <

Re: [cabfpub] Voting begins: Ballot 218 version 2

2018-02-02 Thread Peter Miškovič via Public
Disig abstains. Regards, Peter From: Public [mailto:public-boun...@cabforum.org] On Behalf Of Tim Hollebeek via Public Sent: Monday, January 29, 2018 10:52 PM To: CA/Browser Forum Public Discussion List Subject: [cabfpub] Voting begins: Ballot 218 version 2 I'm highly

Re: [cabfpub] Voting begins: Ballot 218 version 2

2018-02-02 Thread Entschew, Enrico via Public
D-TRUST votes Yes on ballot 2018, version 2 As documented in our CP/CPS we currently use both methods in our current validation practice. The underlying processes are audited by an independent conformity assessment body (TÜV IT) against the specifications of the BR as well as the European

Re: [cabfpub] Voting begins: Ballot 218 version 2

2018-02-02 Thread Mads Egil Henriksveen via Public
Buypass votes NO. There are use cases and scenarios where an improved version of method #1 for proving ownership of a domain would be appropriate. Method #1 is only to be used for OV/EV and as such the authorization to issue the certificate must be given by an authoritative representative of

Re: [cabfpub] Voting begins: Ballot 218 version 2

2018-02-01 Thread Patrick Tronnier via Public
OATI Abstains on Ballot 218 version 2. Thanks With kind regards, Patrick Tronnier Principal Security Architect & Sr. Director of Quality Assurance & Customer Support Phone: 763.201.2000 Direct Line: 763.201.2052 Open Access Technology International, Inc. 3660 Technology Drive NE, Minneapolis,

Re: [cabfpub] Voting begins: Ballot 218 version 2

2018-02-01 Thread Fotis Loukos via Public
SSL.com votes Yes on Ballot 218 version 2. Regards, Fotis On 29/01/2018 11:51 μμ, Tim Hollebeek via Public wrote: >   > > I’m highly skeptical that discussing this for another month will change > anybody’s minds.  It has already been discussed for over a month, > including at three validation

Re: [cabfpub] Voting begins: Ballot 218 version 2

2018-02-01 Thread Tim Hollebeek via Public
You’re right and there is a proposal to do exactly that. It will be discussed on the VWG today if you want to join. We do need a more formal and rigorous evaluation of the risks and vulnerabilities inherent in the use of each validation method. -Tim Intuitively, these methods were

Re: [cabfpub] Voting begins: Ballot 218 version 2

2018-02-01 Thread Dimitris Zacharopoulos via Public
All currently approved Domain Validation methods provide some level of assurance which is not easily quantifiable without calculating the risks (vulnerabilities, threats) of each method. If we had a methodology to quantify the assurance level of each method, we would be able to compare them. The

Re: [cabfpub] Voting begins: Ballot 218 version 2

2018-01-31 Thread zhangyq via Public
GDCA votes YES on Ballot 218. Yongqiang ZHANG 原始邮件 发件人:Curt Spann via publicpub...@cabforum.org 收件人:Tim hollebeektim.holleb...@digicert.com; CA/Browser Forum Public Discussion listpub...@cabforum.org 发送时间:2018年1月30日(周二) 09:26 主题:Re: [cabfpub] Voting begins: Ballot 218 version 2 Apple votes

Re: [cabfpub] Voting begins: Ballot 218 version 2

2018-01-31 Thread philliph--- via Public
Comodo Security Services votes Yes on ballot 218 > > From: Public > on behalf of Tim Hollebeek via Public > > > Reply-To: Tim Hollebeek

Re: [cabfpub] Voting begins: Ballot 218 version 2

2018-01-31 Thread Daymion T. Reynolds via Public
GoDaddy votes YES on Ballot 218 From: Public > on behalf of Tim Hollebeek via Public > Reply-To: Tim Hollebeek >,

Re: [cabfpub] Voting begins: Ballot 218 version 2

2018-01-31 Thread Tim Hollebeek via Public
Yup, the ballot text is what matters, the redline is for convenience. I'll fix the redline. Thanks for the feedback. -Tim From: Doug Beattie [mailto:doug.beat...@globalsign.com] Sent: Wednesday, January 31, 2018 10:50 AM To: Tim Hollebeek ; CA/Browser Forum

Re: [cabfpub] Voting begins: Ballot 218 version 2

2018-01-31 Thread Doug Beattie via Public
GlobalSign votes Yes on ballot 218, version 2. Note that the redlined ballot that Tim attached incorrectly lists the new method, "Validating Applicant as a Domain Contact" as method 10. Sequentially it follows section 2.3.3.4.11 so I'm sure that is a typo, but it's something that needs to be

Re: [cabfpub] Voting begins: Ballot 218 version 2

2018-01-31 Thread Wayne Thayer via Public
Mozilla votes Yes on Ballot 218. Wayne On Mon, Jan 29, 2018 at 2:51 PM, Tim Hollebeek via Public < public@cabforum.org> wrote: > > > I’m highly skeptical that discussing this for another month will change > anybody’s minds. It has already been discussed for over a month, including > at three

Re: [cabfpub] Voting begins: Ballot 218 version 2

2018-01-31 Thread García Jimeno , Oscar via Public
Izenpe votes YES on ballot 218 version 2 .eus gara ! horregatik orain nire helbide elektronikoa da: por eso mi dirección de correo electrónico ahora es: o-gar...@izenpe.eus Oscar García CISSP, CISM [Descripción: Descripción: firma_email_Izenpe_eus] ERNE!

Re: [cabfpub] Voting begins: Ballot 218 version 2

2018-01-30 Thread Mike Reilly (WDG) via Public
Microsoft votes YES From: Public [mailto:public-boun...@cabforum.org] On Behalf Of Tim Hollebeek via Public Sent: Monday, January 29, 2018 1:52 PM To: CA/Browser Forum Public Discussion List Subject: [cabfpub] Voting begins: Ballot 218 version 2 I'm highly skeptical that

Re: [cabfpub] Voting begins: Ballot 218 version 2

2018-01-30 Thread Neil Dunbar via Public
TrustCor votes YES on Ballot 218. Neil > On 30 Jan 2018, at 17:03, Rich Smith via Public wrote: > > Comodo CA votes YES on Ballot 218. ___ Public mailing list Public@cabforum.org https://cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/public

Re: [cabfpub] Voting begins: Ballot 218 version 2

2018-01-30 Thread Rich Smith via Public
Comodo CA votes YES on Ballot 218. From: Public [mailto:public-boun...@cabforum.org] On Behalf Of Tim Hollebeek via Public Sent: Monday, January 29, 2018 3:52 PM To: CA/Browser Forum Public Discussion List Subject: [cabfpub] Voting begins: Ballot 218 version 2 I'm

Re: [cabfpub] Voting begins: Ballot 218 version 2

2018-01-29 Thread Devon O'Brien via Public
Google votes YES on Ballot 218. On Mon, Jan 29, 2018 at 1:53 PM, Tim Hollebeek via Public < public@cabforum.org> wrote: > DigiCert votes YES on Ballot 218. > > > > *From:* Public [mailto:public-boun...@cabforum.org] *On Behalf Of *Tim > Hollebeek via Public > *Sent:* Monday, January 29, 2018

Re: [cabfpub] Voting begins: Ballot 218 version 2

2018-01-29 Thread Tim Hollebeek via Public
DigiCert votes YES on Ballot 218. From: Public [mailto:public-boun...@cabforum.org] On Behalf Of Tim Hollebeek via Public Sent: Monday, January 29, 2018 2:52 PM To: CA/Browser Forum Public Discussion List Subject: [cabfpub] Voting begins: Ballot 218 version 2 I'm