Re: [Pulp-dev] Pull Request builder job changes for plugins

2017-06-15 Thread Brian Bouterse
@dkliban, I think that is a good solution. Since it's currently using the latest GA version of core, all we need to do is extend the current job as you describe. I rewrite the issue [0] to reflect that last part of the work. This is on the current sprint at NEW so I imagine it will get picked up

Re: [Pulp-dev] file repository type

2017-06-15 Thread Brian Bouterse
Yes the git syncing should probably be in a version control plugin that syncs and publishes different VCS protocols like git. +1 to the file plugin doing all of those use cases. Anyone want to file any stories? If we can plan it some, maybe someone will do it.

Re: [Pulp-dev] PUP Process: "obvious consensus"

2017-06-15 Thread Brian Bouterse
I asked about some of these governance questions to a group of community managers from several open source projects that I meet with weekly. They said that if you don't have a BDFL (Pulp does not) the other very popular model is the lazy consensus model. I think lazy consensus is the spirit of

Re: [Pulp-dev] file repository type

2017-06-15 Thread Eric Helms
A few suggestions from my own heavy use of the current "plugin" (and I may repeat some previously said ideas): 1) consider supporting syncing from a few well known types: ftp, apache static file server 2) Support "uploading" a file from a url 3) Look at what wget does and recursively sync down