Thank you for writing these points so clearly. I was working from the other
requirements you wrote [2], but it mostly does the ones below. I'll try to
give answers inline.
[2]: https://pulp.plan.io/issues/2951#note-17
On Thu, Aug 24, 2017 at 4:58 PM, Jeff Ortel wrote:
>
>
>
On 08/24/2017 09:51 AM, Brian Bouterse wrote:
> The next step in considering the asyncio downloaders is done and ready to be
> looked at. The PR made [0]
> replaces the existing downloaders and is "merge-ready". The best way to read
> about them is through their docs
> [1]. Here are some of
The next step in considering the asyncio downloaders is done and ready to
be looked at. The PR made [0] replaces the existing downloaders and is
"merge-ready". The best way to read about them is through their docs [1].
Here are some of its highlights:
# Code size and docs
* huge code savings by