Ahead of the tasking system changes @mdellweg and I are collaborating on,
we wanted to benchmark the current tasking system throughput which I've
measured as a maximum 2.6 tasks / sec.
Check out the test plan, results, and analysis here:
https://hackmd.io/DV633ocwTnShsI8LdajshA
We'll be using
Great question. We haven't had a compelling reason to upgrade to django 3.2
so there are no current plans or roadmap that I'm aware of.
It looks like the EOL for 2.2 security fixes is April 2022 so we definitely
need to upgrade by then. Our two main stakeholders (Katello and Galaxy) are
both
Hi pulp-dev,
We were discussing upcoming plans for Ansible Automation Platform and one
of the items we touched on was Django upgrade to 3.2 which is the next LTS
release. I wanted to reach out and understand if Pulp had any current
plans/roadmap for a similar upgrade. Given the multiple consumers
March 31, 2021
Overview
-
Katello Schedule
-
3.18 November 2020
-
pulpcore 3.7
-
4.0 branching ~February 2021 (dry-run needed by end-of-Dec)
-
pulpcore 3.9
-
4.1 branching ~May 2021
-
pulpcore 3.10
+1 for November date.
Another argument to prefer November dates to September is the preparation
for the AnsibleFest. I think every year we whether get involved in the
booth/talks preparation or some feature delivery to show off.
Regards,
Ina Panova
Senior Software Engineer| Pulp| Red
On Wed, Mar 31, 2021 at 2:39 PM Melanie Corr wrote:
>
>
> Ar Céad 31 Márta 2021 ag 13:36, scríobh Grant Gainey :
>
>> On Wed, Mar 31, 2021 at 8:00 AM David Davis
>> wrote:
>>
>>> After talking to some people this morning, it sounds like November 8-12
>>> would also work. I think people would
On Wed, Mar 31, 2021 at 10:50 AM Matthias Dellweg
wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, Mar 31, 2021 at 4:42 PM Brian Bouterse
> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Mar 31, 2021 at 10:34 AM Fabricio Aguiar
>> wrote:
>>
>>> ## March 31, 2021
>>>
>>> * Github Actions
>>> * good overall
>>> * faster and more
On Wed, Mar 31, 2021 at 4:42 PM Brian Bouterse wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, Mar 31, 2021 at 10:34 AM Fabricio Aguiar
> wrote:
>
>> ## March 31, 2021
>>
>> * Github Actions
>> * good overall
>> * faster and more reliable so far than Travis
>> * easier to debug with tmate action
>>
On Wed, Mar 31, 2021 at 10:34 AM Fabricio Aguiar
wrote:
> ## March 31, 2021
>
> * Github Actions
> * good overall
> * faster and more reliable so far than Travis
> * easier to debug with tmate action
> * downsides
> * virtualization
> * not possible to
## March 31, 2021
* Github Actions
* good overall
* faster and more reliable so far than Travis
* easier to debug with tmate action
* downsides
* virtualization
* not possible to re-run individual jobs
*
## March 31, 2021
* We plan to create a feature gap matrix
* Feature, endpoint, plugin, implemented?, implementable?, priority
* Discuss (asynchronously) a release date for 0.8.0 next wednesday
* [mdellweg] start the thread
___
Pulp-dev mailing
Ar Céad 31 Márta 2021 ag 13:36, scríobh Grant Gainey :
> On Wed, Mar 31, 2021 at 8:00 AM David Davis wrote:
>
>> After talking to some people this morning, it sounds like November 8-12
>> would also work. I think people would rather meet in the fall when the
>> weather is more conducive to being
On Wed, Mar 31, 2021 at 8:00 AM David Davis wrote:
> After talking to some people this morning, it sounds like November 8-12
> would also work. I think people would rather meet in the fall when the
> weather is more conducive to being indoors.
>
> Any objections/thoughts on us having PulpCon the
After talking to some people this morning, it sounds like November 8-12
would also work. I think people would rather meet in the fall when the
weather is more conducive to being indoors.
Any objections/thoughts on us having PulpCon the week of Nov 8-12?
David
On Tue, Mar 30, 2021 at 3:01 PM
14 matches
Mail list logo
