Re: [Pulp-dev] SQlite Issues w/ Pulp3. Switch back to PostgreSQL

2018-04-26 Thread Preethi Thomas
Recently Elyezer was talking about a possible workaround for automation. On Thu, Apr 26, 2018 at 10:29 AM, Jeremy Audet wrote: > +1 to switching away from SQLite. I've often pondered a failed test and > wondered "is this a genuine bug, or a side-effect of using SQLite?" This

Re: [Pulp-dev] Pulp 3 release quality

2018-04-17 Thread Preethi Thomas
egration test suite? Also, looking at https://docs.pulpproject.org/en/3.0/nightly/contributing/continuous_integration.html "The unit tests for both pulpcore and pulpcore-plugin live in the tests <https://github.com/pulp/pulp/blob/3.0-dev/tests/> folder" The link seems to rendering a

Re: [Pulp-dev] Pulp 3 release quality

2018-04-17 Thread Preethi Thomas
"The plan for quality involves the continuous delivery of Pulp 3 where both unit and integration are run with each PR and prior to each release to PyPI" My concern about the above statement is that as the number of tests increases, the time it will take to run the pulp-smash integration suite

Re: [Pulp-dev] Plugin triage

2018-03-07 Thread Preethi Thomas
On Wed, Mar 7, 2018 at 8:58 AM, Robin Chan wrote: > I would like to hear from QE since I know they had some concerns here. > Since the Pulp QE team is much smaller, having to manage attendance to > multiple traige's per week is more of a strain on them to have the >

Re: [Pulp-dev] Deferring 3 things for Pulp3 to 3.1+

2017-12-15 Thread Preethi Thomas
On Fri, Dec 15, 2017 at 4:23 PM, Bryan Kearney wrote: > On 12/12/2017 11:47 AM, Brian Bouterse wrote: > > > > - Lazy downloading. I think this should be a top 3.1 priority. It will > > take a significant effort to update/test/release the streamer so I don't > > think we can

Re: [Pulp-dev] Proposing dropping old fedora releases for 2.15

2017-11-21 Thread Preethi Thomas
+1 On Tue, Nov 21, 2017 at 7:51 AM, David Davis wrote: > +1 > > > David > > On Mon, Nov 20, 2017 at 10:58 PM, Daniel Alley wrote: > >> +1 >> >> On Mon, Nov 20, 2017 at 9:24 AM, Ina Panova wrote: >> >>> +1 >>> >>> >>> >>>

Re: [Pulp-dev] Proposal to replace pulp 2.15's nightly jobs

2017-11-10 Thread Preethi Thomas
On Fri, Nov 10, 2017 at 11:59 AM, Patrick Creech wrote: > On Fri, 2017-11-10 at 11:35 -0500, Jeremy Audet wrote: > > > > Hosting packages in just one place is simpler than hosting packages > in multiple places. > > > > There's > > > > less room for error when the simpler

Re: [Pulp-dev] Proposal to replace pulp 2.15's nightly jobs

2017-11-10 Thread Preethi Thomas
On Fri, Nov 10, 2017 at 11:35 AM, Jeremy Audet wrote: > Hosting packages in just one place is simpler than hosting packages in >>> multiple places. There's >>> less room for error when the simpler thing is done. >>> >> >> It shouldn't be too hard to set up. >> > > Fair enough.

Re: [Pulp-dev] Proposal to replace pulp 2.15's nightly jobs

2017-11-10 Thread Preethi Thomas
On Fri, Nov 10, 2017 at 10:43 AM, Patrick Creech wrote: > On Fri, 2017-11-10 at 10:26 -0500, Jeremy Audet wrote: > > On Thu, Nov 9, 2017 at 4:58 PM, Patrick Creech > wrote: > > > As part of the ongoing release engineer changes, I would like to > propose

Re: [Pulp-dev] Pulp logo with new fonts

2016-11-23 Thread Preethi Thomas
On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 11:46 AM, Og Maciel wrote: > I **really** love the new logo!!! > +1 > > On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 11:14 AM, Ina Panova wrote: > >> Team, >> >> take a look at the changes that have been done [0]: >> >> - leaves are a bit shrunk, so

[Pulp-dev] Weekly bug trend report 9/16/2016

2016-09-16 Thread Preethi Thomas
This week's report https://pulp.plan.io/projects/pulp/wiki/Bug_Trends_Report_2016-09-16 Please let me know if you have any questions, comments or feedback. Also please provide any suggestion on what other information would be useful in the report. Previous week's reports

[Pulp-dev] Weekly bug trend report 9/9/2016

2016-09-09 Thread Preethi Thomas
This week's report https://pulp.plan.io/projects/pulp/wiki/Bug_Trends_Report_2016-09-09 Please let me know if you have any questions, comments or feedback. Also please provide any suggestion on what other information would be useful in the report. Previous week's reports

Re: [Pulp-dev] 2.9.3 beta

2016-09-09 Thread Preethi Thomas
> > Michael > > On Thu, Sep 8, 2016 at 10:50 AM, Preethi Thomas <ptho...@redhat.com> > wrote: > >> They are running, but sometimes we do have to manually trigger them. >> >> Here is the latest run ( on September 5) >> https://pulp-jenkins.rhev-ci-vms.eng.rd