Re: [Pulp-dev] No 'result' field for a Task in Pulp3

On Mon, Apr 24, 2017 at 3:48 PM, Jeff Ortel wrote: > The > "result" report /could/ provide an indicator of success and a > summary/detail of work completed. These two > things seem completely different. I'm not advocating for a "result", just > pointing out the differences.

[Pulp-dev] No 'result' field for a Task in Pulp3

Today on a call an observation was made that Pulp3 does not need 'results' for a task. All non-error info about what happened during a task is associated with it's associated "Progress Report" objects [0]. Is there a use case where 'result' is meaningful that we preclude by removing it? I