.To kind of sum things up: issues with pulp-smash itself will still be
filled in the pulp-smash Github repo. Also, the documentation for
pulp-smash will continue to reside on readthedocs (RTD).
For Pulp 2, issues with the tests will be filed at the Pulp-2-tests repo
and the docs for tests will res
Sounds good Kersom. I think we're on the same page, but want to write a
description to help be sure. Here is what we can offer in terms of the docs:
Any docstring that is within the same repo as the sphinx project can be
included. This is true for a plugin repo and core. I'll give an example
with
I am ok with your suggestions Brian.
I like the idea to the documents for the test related to a certain plugin
live at the same website as the plugin itself. I am not sure how much
adjustments will be necessary to the doctrings for the tests to be added to
the current plugin docs. Maybe just add a
Thanks for the reply Kersom. I responded inline.
On Mon, Aug 13, 2018 at 3:49 PM, Kersom wrote:
> Thank you for this thread.
>
> Currently there are dedicated documents for Pulp-Smash on readthedocs. [0]
> Issues related to Pulp-Smash itself should be filed here [1]
>
+1
>
> Documentation for P
Thank you for this thread.
Currently there are dedicated documents for Pulp-Smash on readthedocs. [0]
Issues related to Pulp-Smash itself should be filed here [1]
Documentation for Pulp 2 tests were created on readthedocs [2] after these
tests were moved from Pulp-Smash.
Issues related to Pulp 2
On Thu, Aug 9, 2018 at 5:42 PM, Daniel Alley wrote:
> I think this is fine where it is. pulp2 is going into maintenance mode at
>> some point here soon.
>
>
> That makes sense for the Pulp 2 smash test docs, but it's still a problem
> if we want to have smash test docs for Pulp 3 (which, we do)
>
>
> I think this is fine where it is. pulp2 is going into maintenance mode at
> some point here soon.
That makes sense for the Pulp 2 smash test docs, but it's still a problem
if we want to have smash test docs for Pulp 3 (which, we do)
On Thu, Aug 9, 2018 at 5:12 PM, Brian Bouterse wrote:
> T
Thanks for bringing this up. I put some responses inline.
On Thu, Aug 9, 2018 at 4:22 PM, David Davis wrote:
> One of the things that may not make sense anymore is how we document and
> track issues for pulp-smash tests given that these tests no longer reside
> in the pulp-smash repo. Currently,
One of the things that may not make sense anymore is how we document and
track issues for pulp-smash tests given that these tests no longer reside
in the pulp-smash repo. Currently, all the test-related issues are tracked
here[0].
With the tests no longer in the pulp-smash repo, I wonder if it mak
