Re: [Pulp-dev] commit-bit nomination

Folks, thanks for your feedback and your trust, I do really appreciate your votes and my nomination and I'm glad the majority of the electorate participated in the vote. I do believe an open commit bit assignment process is essential for a viable community project as it boosts diversity which in

Re: [Pulp-dev] commit-bit nomination

Hi all, We have had some challenges in the first execution of the new process to add a new commit bit owner. Some implications of the process were not fully realized until implemented, and the results were regrettable. Our goal is to create an inviting atmosphere for community members, and to

Re: [Pulp-dev] commit-bit nomination

-1 Milan has been a great contributor to the Pulp 2 RPM effort. I am looking forward to all the future contributions in both Pulp 2 and Pulp 3. However, after collaborating with Milan on issue 2619[0], I decided that he needs more mentorship. I can provide more feedback directly to you Milan.

Re: [Pulp-dev] commit-bit nomination

+1, I agree that Milan has met the criteria. I think we should go forward with giving him the bit and larger discussions about decision making can happen separately. On Mon, Sep 10, 2018 at 9:03 AM Ina Panova wrote: > Brian, > > it feels like your reply is in contradiction of what we are trying

Re: [Pulp-dev] commit-bit nomination

Brian, it feels like your reply is in contradiction of what we are trying to achieve as a community project: 1) I am concerned that this reply can be perceived very badly by the community, especially once we approved the pup and announced this in hope of community embracing this change, by

Re: [Pulp-dev] commit-bit nomination

I respectfully disagree. I was hoping for more discussion before the calling of a vote. > The process described in PUP6 specifically states that the nominating email should have a vote end date, thus calling a vote. There's nothing wrong with having discussion now on this thread, as part of

Re: [Pulp-dev] commit-bit nomination

I was hoping for more discussion before the calling of a vote. I'm a committer in both of these areas, and this nomination surprised me since we've never talked about either change. I have concerns both with increasing the sizes of these teams and also with this specific nomination at this time.

Re: [Pulp-dev] commit-bit nomination

Dana, Daniel, thanks guys, I really appreciate the recognition! :) Cheers, milan PS: my GitHub https://github.com/dparalen On Wed, Sep 5, 2018 at 4:56 PM, Dana Walker wrote: > +1 > > Enthusiastically! > > Dana Walker > > Associate Software Engineer > > Red Hat > > >

Re: [Pulp-dev] commit-bit nomination

+1 Enthusiastically! Dana Walker Associate Software Engineer Red Hat On Wed, Sep 5, 2018 at 10:44 AM, Daniel Alley wrote: > Now that PUP 6 has been merged, it's time to follow the process :) > > I would like to nominate Milan Kovacik