Re: [Pulp-dev] Testing Epic for Distribution / AutoDistribution

2019-05-21 Thread Brian Bouterse
@QE I filed another test case which covers the last gap, PublishedArtifact. The test proposes we use the Debian plugin since it's the only plugin I know of that has PublishedArtifact usage. I'm not sure if it's feasible, but I wanted to file it anyway so the testing plan has no gaps. It is missing

Re: [Pulp-dev] Testing Epic for Distribution / AutoDistribution

2019-05-18 Thread Matthias Dellweg
On Fri, 17 May 2019 15:44:32 -0400 Brian Bouterse wrote: > We removed some functional tests recently from core because the > Distribution part of Master/Detail was so heavily reworked. We want to > rethink the testing in this area with new functional tests, so I > wrote out a testing epic here:

Re: [Pulp-dev] Testing Epic for Distribution / AutoDistribution

2019-05-17 Thread Kersom
I just read the epic, and it looks pretty good. Thanks for the update. Once we start automating those features, we can add comments, if any. On Fri, May 17, 2019 at 3:45 PM Brian Bouterse wrote: > We removed some functional tests recently from core because the > Distribution part of Master/De