Re: [Pulp-dev] Seeking Nomenclature

Thanks for the replies so far. Sounds like parent -> child might be the best nomenclature that has been used previously and fits our style. In our case there is only one Pulp that is master of the universe and every other Pulp is simply a copy of pieces of the master errr parent but never contains

Re: [Pulp-dev] Seeking Nomenclature

We also have called it "Pulp to Pulp sync" informally. On Mon, Feb 19, 2018 at 3:23 PM, David Davis wrote: > So syncing from one Pulp server to another Pulp server is usually called > 'natural syncing'. See [0][1]. > > AFAIK, there is no official concept of

Re: [Pulp-dev] Seeking Nomenclature

So syncing from one Pulp server to another Pulp server is usually called 'natural syncing'. See [0][1]. AFAIK, there is no official concept of master/nodes/etc in Pulp anymore since in the case of natural syncing, there’s nothing special about either instance of Pulp. We have used the terms