Re: [Pulp-dev] PUP Process: "obvious consensus"

2017-08-11 Thread Ina Panova
+1. Thanks Brian for all your effort and commitment. Regards, Ina Panova Software Engineer| Pulp| Red Hat Inc. "Do not go where the path may lead, go instead where there is no path and leave a trail." On Thu, Aug 10, 2017 at 9:58 PM, Daniel Alley wrote: > +1 > > On Thu, Aug 10, 20

Re: [Pulp-dev] PUP Process: "obvious consensus"

2017-08-11 Thread Michael Hrivnak
+1 On Fri, Aug 11, 2017 at 4:54 AM, Ina Panova wrote: > +1. > Thanks Brian for all your effort and commitment. > > > > > Regards, > > Ina Panova > Software Engineer| Pulp| Red Hat Inc. > > "Do not go where the path may lead, > go instead where there is no path and leave a trail." > > O

Re: [Pulp-dev] Redundancy in docstrings and serializer help_text

2017-08-11 Thread Brian Bouterse
+1 to adopting this idea. @mhrivnak your summary sounds good. What is the next step to doing this? On Thu, Aug 10, 2017 at 11:36 AM, Michael Hrivnak wrote: > This seems like a good approach. I'd summarize it as: > > Try hard to put the documentation for each field of a model only on the > corre

[Pulp-dev] checkout.py script updates

2017-08-11 Thread Brian Bouterse
FYI, I added an option [0] called --base-dir to the checkout.py script [1] which allows the tool to operate on a checkout in any part of the filesystem. With this I was able to get both a Pulp2 and Pulp3 vagrant box both running and usable at the same time! I also cherry picked the checkout.py scr