Re: [Pulp-dev] Pulp 3 release quality

Dennis, Thanks for putting this together. I don't see any responses on this thread and take that to mean there were no concerns about this proposal. Would this process/responsibility change need to go anywhere? (Side questions, was this technically a PUP?) "author of the PR would need to be

Re: [Pulp-dev] Changesets Challenges

On Fri, Apr 6, 2018 at 10:15 AM, Brian Bouterse wrote: > Several plugins have started using the Changesets including pulp_ansible, > pulp_python, pulp_file, and perhaps others. The Changesets provide several > distinct points of value which are great, but there are two

[Pulp-dev] Changesets Challenges

Several plugins have started using the Changesets including pulp_ansible, pulp_python, pulp_file, and perhaps others. The Changesets provide several distinct points of value which are great, but there are two challenges I want to bring up. I want to focus only on the problem statements first. 1.

Re: [Pulp-dev] Content paths in Pulp 3

IMO: We should suggest v3/content///. [Proposal 1] We should mention the other options with the pros, cons in the plugin writer docs. On Thu, Apr 5, 2018 at 10:54 AM, David Davis wrote: > > [0] https://pulp.plan.io/issues/3407 > The correct link is: