Re: [Pulp-dev] Spam on plan.io

2018-12-07 Thread Austin Macdonald
On Wed, Oct 31, 2018, 3:57 PM Austin Macdonald On Wed, Oct 31, 2018, 2:23 PM Daniel Alley >> Maybe the first comment / issue posted by an account would need to be >> approved, but once approved they could post subsequent comments / issues >> without delay? >> >> > @dalley, sounds right to me. I

Re: [Pulp-dev] Proposal: merge the content-app & streamer

2018-12-07 Thread Brian Bouterse
During the demo yesterday it was pointed out that 'cache_only' doesn't make sense as a name anymore since Pulp itself isn't doing the caching. Here's an issue to rename it with some naming suggestions: https://pulp.plan.io/issues/4243 On Thu, Dec 6, 2018 at 3:26 PM Brian Bouterse wrote: > I've

Re: [Pulp-dev] Single-Table Content API Changes, Performance Discussion

2018-12-07 Thread Dennis Kliban
On Thu, Dec 6, 2018 at 6:04 PM Daniel Alley wrote: > I'm not necessarily against this but I'll recap some points I made on IRC: > > The burden of knowing where to go to get that information would be pushed > off onto the API user. If we're not returning the URL, then anyone using > the API must

Re: [Pulp-dev] Spam on plan.io

2018-12-07 Thread Dana Walker
We should make an effort to mention this to new contributors when on say #pulp we encourage someone to submit or comment so they don't wonder what's wrong. --Dana Dana Walker Associate Software Engineer Red Hat On Fri, Dec 7, 2018 at 4:24 PM

Re: [Pulp-dev] Spam on plan.io

2018-12-07 Thread Robin Chan
Removing incentive seems like a good tactic to try. And perhaps we can take a look at some metrics to see if it's helping after trying for a bit. On Fri, Dec 7, 2018 at 7:26 AM Austin Macdonald wrote: > > > On Wed, Oct 31, 2018, 3:57 PM Austin Macdonald >> On Wed, Oct 31, 2018, 2:23 PM Daniel

Re: [Pulp-dev] Changes to pulp’s directory structure

2018-12-07 Thread David Davis
Just a reminder that this is happening today. I’ll wait until 5:00 PM EST (22:00 UTC) to give people time to merge any last minute changes. David On Tue, Dec 4, 2018 at 2:30 PM David Davis wrote: > As part of https://pulp.plan.io/issues/4101, the pulp repository[0] will > be restructured so

Re: [Pulp-dev] Possible Pulp3 RC Blocker issues from backlog

2018-12-07 Thread Jeff Ortel
Decisions look good to me. On 12/5/18 11:36 AM, Brian Bouterse wrote: I commented on the jwt one that I think it can be closed and why: https://pulp.plan.io/issues/3248#note-6 On Wed, Dec 5, 2018 at 8:54 AM David Davis > wrote: Awesome, thanks! David