I finally got around to outlining the next steps we discussed.
# The two stories that should be done next
https://pulp.plan.io/issues/7700
https://pulp.plan.io/issues/7701
# I closed this story because we don't have a plan for it. We can reopen it
later when we do
The result of our discussion was to pursue a (somewhat) different approach to
the one from the PR.
It therefore makes sense to close the PR.
I am a bit fuzzy on what the next steps were (adding a public key to the
SigningService base class?), but I suppose I will just have to re-watch the
At the pulpcore meeting we noticed the signing service PR [0] had stalled
and instead we needed to work towards the next-steps identified in the
video call and discussed on this thread. I closed that PR with a note
asking that we focus on the next steps we discussed in the meeting (also
linked to
Sorry for the long delay in reply. Thank you for the email. I also want to
unblock that PR. I put some replies in line.
On Wed, Jun 24, 2020 at 7:03 AM Quirin Pamp wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> However we decide to continue with the SigningService topic in the medium
> and longrun, I wanted to have one
