On 11/17/2014 08:46 AM, Chris Duryee wrote:
> Would RPMs be built from the meta-repo, or for each python package?
We could do it that way, or we could just use our new pulp_packaging
repo for that. I guess that begs the question of what the meta repo
would be good for, but perhaps it would be usef
tter than the options we have today.
Thanks!
--
Barnaby Court
- Original Message -
From: "Randy Barlow"
To: pulp-list@redhat.com
Sent: Thursday, November 13, 2014 2:00:43 PM
Subject: [Pulp-list] [devel] git submodules
What if we used git submodules to put each Python package
On 11/17/2014 10:18 AM, Michael Hrivnak wrote:
> One of the big points of convenience with having the python packages under
> one repo is the ability to make one pull request that touches multiple
> packages. This is quite common, for example something as simple as adding a
> constant to the com
using git
submodules?
Michael
- Original Message -
From: "Randy Barlow"
To: pulp-list@redhat.com
Sent: Thursday, November 13, 2014 2:00:43 PM
Subject: [Pulp-list] [devel] git submodules
What if we used git submodules to put each Python package we have in its own
git repos
On 11/13/2014 02:00 PM, Randy Barlow wrote:
> What if we used git submodules to put each Python package we have in its own
> git repository, and then the "pulp" repo just brings them together for
> convenience? This way we could do something along the lines of this:
>
> $ pip install -e http:/
On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 2:00 PM, Randy Barlow wrote:
> What if we used git submodules to put each Python package we have in its own
> git repository, and then the "pulp" repo just brings them together for
> convenience? This way we could do something along the lines of this:
>
> $ pip install -e
What if we used git submodules to put each Python package we have in its own
git repository, and then the "pulp" repo just brings them together for
convenience? This way we could do something along the lines of this:
$ pip install -e http://github.com/pulp/pulp_rpm_plugins
Meanwhile, we could c
