Re: [Pulp-list] Using Pulp to "merge" multiple RPM repos into one?

2015-09-14 Thread Nick Coghlan
On 11 September 2015 at 23:09, Michael Hrivnak wrote: > I think your plan is spot-on. In usually makes sense to have a 1-1 mapping > of remote repos to pulp repos, and to keep the pulp repo as a simple mirror > of that remote repo. From there, you can copy out of the

[Pulp-list] Using Pulp to "merge" multiple RPM repos into one?

2015-09-11 Thread Nick Coghlan
Hi folks, As part of a development workflow idea for the Fedora Environments & Stacks working group [1], I'm looking to build a service that lets people select multiple COPR repos, and have them automatically integrated into a single downstream repo. As a starting point, I'm aiming to build the

Re: [Pulp-list] Using Pulp to "merge" multiple RPM repos into one?

2015-09-11 Thread Michael Hrivnak
I think your plan is spot-on. In usually makes sense to have a 1-1 mapping of remote repos to pulp repos, and to keep the pulp repo as a simple mirror of that remote repo. From there, you can copy out of the pulp-hosted mirrors to compose new repos with whatever mix of content you like. Michael