Re: [Pulp-list] Feedback Requested: Unified Ansible Installer for Pulp 3

2018-06-08 Thread Brian Bouterse
Bruno, thank you for pointing that out. I agree. This introduces a new use case: to be able to install Python packages to the system and not into a virtualenv. It also made us think about root as being a requirement for running this playbook with its defaults. I've updated the two tickets that

Re: [Pulp-list] Feedback Requested: Unified Ansible Installer for Pulp 3

2018-06-08 Thread Bruno Rocha
Just a note: As containers are already isolated from the hosting system I think that a Virtualenv is an unnecessary layer inside a container, we can just install the packages in the container's Python environment. -- Bruno Rocha Senior Quality Engineer Red Hat

Re: [Pulp-list] Feedback Requested: Unified Ansible Installer for Pulp 3

2018-06-08 Thread Brian Bouterse
It's a legit question. A small amount of the installer work would be unused but not much. The installer (or something like it) will be needed to install+configure the bits inside the containers themselves. Specifically, the installer could be used to populate a container with the virtualenv,

Re: [Pulp-list] Feedback Requested: Unified Ansible Installer for Pulp 3

2018-06-08 Thread Bryan Kearney
Somewhat of a troll, somewhat not. If pulp3 was delivered only in containers on top of kube... how much of the installer work "goes away"? -- bk On 06/07/2018 05:53 PM, Austin Macdonald wrote: > The installer sub-group has collected use cases and drafted a high level > design for a unified

[Pulp-list] Feedback Requested: Unified Ansible Installer for Pulp 3

2018-06-07 Thread Austin Macdonald
The installer sub-group has collected use cases and drafted a high level design for a unified Ansible installer for Pulp 3. Our goal is that this installer will be useful for: - end users - QE - developer installation - plugin writers - integrators - other (please comment if this is