Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] [PATCH v5 39/39] bluetooth: Revive module-bluetooth-discover

2013-09-27 Thread Fox, Kevin M
Is there a reason that the struct is: +struct userdata { +pa_module *bluez5_module; +pa_module *bluez4_module; +}; and not: +struct userdata { +pa_module *bluez_module; +}; The code might be cleaner looking with the latter struct. Thanks, Kevin

[pulseaudio-discuss] [PATCH] default/system.pa: Do not load module-dbus-protocol

2013-09-27 Thread David Henningsson
The author of this module, Tanu Kaskinen, has said that this module is not suitable for general use. Also, it is still causing crashes on card removal (see bug 69871). Qpaeq, and possibly other tools, use this module - but they can load the module manually if they still wish to use it.

Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] Best Case Latency

2013-09-27 Thread Patrick Shirkey
On Thu, September 26, 2013 2:27 am, Tanu Kaskinen wrote: On Wed, 2013-09-25 at 23:35 +1000, Patrick Shirkey wrote: On Tue, September 24, 2013 10:33 pm, Patrick Shirkey wrote: On Mon, September 23, 2013 6:11 pm, Tanu Kaskinen wrote: The audio is accumulating in some buffer, and the JACK

Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] Best Case Latency

2013-09-27 Thread Tanu Kaskinen
On Fri, 2013-09-27 at 19:26 +1000, Patrick Shirkey wrote: On Thu, September 26, 2013 2:27 am, Tanu Kaskinen wrote: Sorry, forgot to reply earlier. Yes, you can check the stream buffer with pactl list sink-inputs. The Buffer Latency field shows the amount of audio in the stream buffer (not

Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] [PATCH v5 39/39] bluetooth: Revive module-bluetooth-discover

2013-09-27 Thread Tanu Kaskinen
On Tue, 2013-09-24 at 16:16 -0700, Fox, Kevin M wrote: Is there a reason that the struct is: +struct userdata { +pa_module *bluez5_module; +pa_module *bluez4_module; +}; and not: +struct userdata { +pa_module *bluez_module; +}; The code might be cleaner looking with the

Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] Best Case Latency

2013-09-27 Thread Tanu Kaskinen
On Fri, 2013-09-27 at 23:31 +1000, Patrick Shirkey wrote: On Fri, September 27, 2013 10:52 pm, Tanu Kaskinen wrote: On Fri, 2013-09-27 at 19:26 +1000, Patrick Shirkey wrote: On Thu, September 26, 2013 2:27 am, Tanu Kaskinen wrote: Sorry, forgot to reply earlier. Yes, you can check the

Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] Best Case Latency

2013-09-27 Thread Patrick Shirkey
On Sat, September 28, 2013 2:58 am, Patrick Shirkey wrote: On Sat, September 28, 2013 12:53 am, Tanu Kaskinen wrote: On Fri, 2013-09-27 at 23:31 +1000, Patrick Shirkey wrote: At the moment I'm trying to pin down the cause of the consistent and reproducible but fluctuating latency results

Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] [PATCH] Support building pulseaudio with Android NDK

2013-09-27 Thread Arun Raghavan
On Wed, 2013-09-18 at 16:22 +0200, Anton Lundin wrote: Signed-off-by: Anton Lundin gla...@acc.umu.se --- src/daemon/main.c | 2 +- src/pulsecore/core-util.c | 8 src/pulsecore/rtkit.c | 2 +- 3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) Thanks, I've had a similar

Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] [PATCH] Support pulseaudio as a submodule

2013-09-27 Thread Arun Raghavan
On Wed, 2013-09-18 at 16:20 +0200, Anton Lundin wrote: When pulseaudio is a submodule, .git is a file. Signed-off-by: Anton Lundin gla...@acc.umu.se --- Pulled this one to my tree, thanks. -- Arun ___ pulseaudio-discuss mailing list