Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] Best Case Latency

2013-10-03 Thread Tanu Kaskinen
On Thu, 2013-10-03 at 02:33 +1000, Patrick Shirkey wrote: On Thu, October 3, 2013 12:14 am, Tanu Kaskinen wrote: On Tue, 2013-10-01 at 00:38 +1000, Patrick Shirkey wrote: On Sat, September 28, 2013 3:12 am, Patrick Shirkey wrote: On Sat, September 28, 2013 12:53 am, Tanu Kaskinen wrote:

Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] [PATCH 4/5] bluetooth: Remove device_remove_all()

2013-10-03 Thread Javier Jardón
On 2 October 2013 15:28, Tanu Kaskinen tanu.kaski...@linux.intel.com wrote: On Tue, 2013-10-01 at 10:43 -0300, João Paulo Rechi Vita wrote: Ack. Same question about testing applies here, and I should have made it more generic, actually: Do you have audio devices to be able to test these

Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] Best Case Latency

2013-10-03 Thread Tanu Kaskinen
On Thu, 2013-10-03 at 18:20 +1000, Patrick Shirkey wrote: On Thu, October 3, 2013 5:14 pm, Tanu Kaskinen wrote: On Thu, 2013-10-03 at 02:33 +1000, Patrick Shirkey wrote: I see the following sprinkled in /var/log/messages Sep 30 12:19:02 xxx pulseaudio[28845]: [pulseaudio] ratelimit.c:

Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] [PATCH 4/5] bluetooth: Remove device_remove_all()

2013-10-03 Thread João Paulo Rechi Vita
On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 11:28 AM, Tanu Kaskinen tanu.kaski...@linux.intel.com wrote: On Tue, 2013-10-01 at 10:43 -0300, João Paulo Rechi Vita wrote: Ack. Same question about testing applies here, and I should have made it more generic, actually: Do you have audio devices to be able to test

Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] Best Case Latency

2013-10-03 Thread Thomas Martitz
Am 03.10.2013 10:20, schrieb Patrick Shirkey: On Thu, October 3, 2013 5:14 pm, Tanu Kaskinen wrote: That doesn't look healthy. The message is printed when pa_asyncmsgq_post() is called and the message queue is full. The message queue can store 256 messages before this starts to happen, so some

Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] [PATCH] alsa-mixer: Drop all unused paths, not only unsupported paths

2013-10-03 Thread David Henningsson
On 09/23/2013 02:00 PM, David Henningsson wrote: This is a cleaner solution, because it also removes paths that are being removed because they are subsets of other paths. Otherwise, the lingering paths could cause jack detection related assertion failures. No reviews, now pushed.

[pulseaudio-discuss] [PATCH] simple: Improve pa_simple_read() documentation

2013-10-03 Thread Tanu Kaskinen
There was a question in IRC about whether pa_simple_read() blocks or not. It's already documented on the simple API overview page, but it's good to say it also in the function reference. As a bonus, I added some words about the error handling as well. --- src/pulse/simple.h | 5 - 1 file

Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] [PATCH] simple: Improve pa_simple_read() documentation

2013-10-03 Thread Peter Meerwald
There was a question in IRC about whether pa_simple_read() blocks or not. It's already documented on the simple API overview page, but it's good to say it also in the function reference. As a bonus, I added some words about the error handling as well. pa_simple_new() already has a better