Hello.
Note: this is not a CVE request yet! Before making a formal CVE request,
I would need to collect official information on the topic who needs to
do what with this bug (although I do have my own opinion, see below).
For now, I just want to start a discussion by posting this to the
On Sun, Sep 29, 2013 at 1:39 PM, Tanu Kaskinen
tanu.kaski...@linux.intel.com wrote:
On Tue, 2013-09-24 at 19:45 -0300, jprv...@gmail.com wrote:
+void pa__done(pa_module* m) {
+struct userdata *u;
+
+pa_assert(m);
+
+if (!(u = m-userdata))
+return;
+
+if
On Tue, 2013-10-08 at 11:19 -0300, João Paulo Rechi Vita wrote:
On Sun, Sep 29, 2013 at 1:39 PM, Tanu Kaskinen
tanu.kaski...@linux.intel.com wrote:
On Tue, 2013-09-24 at 19:45 -0300, jprv...@gmail.com wrote:
+void pa__done(pa_module* m) {
+struct userdata *u;
+
+pa_assert(m);
Hi,
I wanted to enumerate the ports on the cards through vala today. I
quickly found that the vala binding was not up-to-date, so I added
fields for that (see attachment).
However, to be able to access the card ports, I needed to do two things
differently from how the existing arrays look:
1)
Hi,
Can someone review my patch for the bug:
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=70096
Regards,
Kiran
On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 9:43 AM, Kiran Krishnappa kira...@gmail.com wrote:
PA_SAMPLE_24NE generated in pa_sndfile_read_sample_spec is not
handled in pa_sndfile_readf_function.
