On Tue, 3 Sep 2019, at 12:13 AM, Brian Bulkowski wrote:
> Thanks for the response, if you don't believe this is a good use, I
> won't bother further. GStreamer, then.
If you have something working with PulseAudio, it might make sense to keep it
and maybe change incrementally rather than going
Thanks for the response, if you don't believe this is a good use, I
won't bother further. GStreamer, then.
Regards ---
-brian
On 9/1/2019 11:58 PM, Arun Raghavan wrote:
Hey Brian,
On Mon, 2 Sep 2019, at 11:45 AM, Brian Bulkowski wrote:
Hey Arun,
Thanks for responding.
I usually point
Hey Brian,
On Mon, 2 Sep 2019, at 11:45 AM, Brian Bulkowski wrote:
> Hey Arun,
>
> Thanks for responding.
>
> > I usually point folks to the sync-playback.c test that we have a starting
> > point, but this is certainly less than ideal.
>
> "less than ideal" is quite the politeness. Let's
Hey Arun,
Thanks for responding.
I usually point folks to the sync-playback.c test that we have a starting
point, but this is certainly less than ideal.
"less than ideal" is quite the politeness. Let's see
1) it doesn't cover files, nor does it cover files of different types (
mp3 vs