I disagree. As an engineer you should know that an implementation should not be based on broken devices , but rarher on good standard specifications. Rare broken devices, and rare very old devices that don't follow A2DP specifications shouldn't be the main design target for Pulseaudio.Jp18:29, 8
On Monday 07 October 2019 10:32:10 Hyperion wrote:
> Not sure it's expired worlwide. In case it is, it's good news. Fine for
> me.10:28, 7 octobre 2019, "Pali Rohár"
> pali.ro...@gmail.com: class="b4fd5cf2ec92bc68cb898700bb81355fwmi-quote">If you mean EP
Explained in other email. We cannot change Automatic SBC profile to not
break some existing devices (with broken A2DP implementation).
One of the main objections against SBC codec is that user does not "what
version of SBC quality is in use" and therefore other proprietary codecs
with fixed
Automatic SBC profile is not going to be changed. It is there to support
all devices without any tweaks. ValdikSS already did more tests and
there are devices which do not work with higher SBC bitpool. So
increasing max value of bitpool in Automatic SBC profile would lead to
broken support for
