On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 3:08 AM, David Henningsson
david.hennings...@canonical.com wrote:
On 2014-09-16 19:39, Felipe Sateler wrote:
On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 11:32 AM, David Henningsson
david.hennings...@canonical.com wrote:
On 2014-09-16 15:09, Tanu Kaskinen wrote:
On Tue, 2014-09-16
On Tue, 2014-09-16 at 16:32 +0200, David Henningsson wrote:
Removing the 20-second delay sounds like the right thing to do, but I
wonder if it will cause startup problems? E g, if PA autospawns, and
there are no systemd modules or anything else keeping it alive (e g
because the user does
On Mon, 2014-09-15 at 12:09 -0300, Felipe Sateler wrote:
On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 5:50 AM, Tanu Kaskinen
tanu.kaski...@linux.intel.com wrote:
On Wed, 2014-09-10 at 09:51 -0300, Felipe Sateler wrote:
On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 6:18 AM, David Henningsson
david.hennings...@canonical.com wrote:
On 2014-09-15 17:09, Felipe Sateler wrote:
On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 5:50 AM, Tanu Kaskinen
tanu.kaski...@linux.intel.com wrote:
On Wed, 2014-09-10 at 09:51 -0300, Felipe Sateler wrote:
On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 6:18 AM, David Henningsson
david.hennings...@canonical.com wrote:
On 2014-04-13
On Tue, 2014-09-16 at 14:27 +0200, David Henningsson wrote:
On 2014-09-15 17:09, Felipe Sateler wrote:
On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 5:50 AM, Tanu Kaskinen
tanu.kaski...@linux.intel.com wrote:
On Wed, 2014-09-10 at 09:51 -0300, Felipe Sateler wrote:
I would think the daemon is per-session,
On 2014-09-16 15:09, Tanu Kaskinen wrote:
On Tue, 2014-09-16 at 14:27 +0200, David Henningsson wrote:
On 2014-09-15 17:09, Felipe Sateler wrote:
On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 5:50 AM, Tanu Kaskinen
tanu.kaski...@linux.intel.com wrote:
On Wed, 2014-09-10 at 09:51 -0300, Felipe Sateler wrote:
I
On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 11:32 AM, David Henningsson
david.hennings...@canonical.com wrote:
On 2014-09-16 15:09, Tanu Kaskinen wrote:
On Tue, 2014-09-16 at 14:27 +0200, David Henningsson wrote:
On 2014-09-15 17:09, Felipe Sateler wrote:
On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 5:50 AM, Tanu Kaskinen
On Wed, 2014-09-10 at 09:51 -0300, Felipe Sateler wrote:
On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 6:18 AM, David Henningsson
david.hennings...@canonical.com wrote:
On 2014-04-13 20:21, Balint Reczey wrote:
Hi,
This patch has been contributed through Debian's bug tracker.
Please review it and
On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 5:50 AM, Tanu Kaskinen
tanu.kaski...@linux.intel.com wrote:
On Wed, 2014-09-10 at 09:51 -0300, Felipe Sateler wrote:
On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 6:18 AM, David Henningsson
david.hennings...@canonical.com wrote:
On 2014-04-13 20:21, Balint Reczey wrote:
Hi,
This
On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 12:09 PM, Felipe Sateler fsate...@debian.org wrote:
On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 5:50 AM, Tanu Kaskinen
tanu.kaski...@linux.intel.com wrote:
On Wed, 2014-09-10 at 09:51 -0300, Felipe Sateler wrote:
On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 6:18 AM, David Henningsson
On 2014-04-13 20:21, Balint Reczey wrote:
Hi,
This patch has been contributed through Debian's bug tracker.
Please review it and consider accepting it to the project's code base if
you find it useful.
Thanks,
Balint
Hi Balint,
I wonder if the above can cause a problem if:
1) User starts
On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 6:18 AM, David Henningsson
david.hennings...@canonical.com wrote:
On 2014-04-13 20:21, Balint Reczey wrote:
Hi,
This patch has been contributed through Debian's bug tracker.
Please review it and consider accepting it to the project's code base if
you find it
Hi,
This patch has been contributed through Debian's bug tracker.
Please review it and consider accepting it to the project's code base if
you find it useful.
Thanks,
Balint
From 3345277fe7491c0250462dd836e1a440e35d98a6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Alexander Kurtz kurtz.a...@googlemail.com
13 matches
Mail list logo
