Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] [PATCH] tests: add tolerant variation for comparing the rewind result

2015-05-25 Thread David Henningsson
On 2015-05-25 06:49, Hui Wang wrote: On 32bits OS, this test case fails. The reason is when rewinding to the middle of a block, some of float parameters in the saved_state are stored in the memory from FPU registers, and those parameters will be used for next time to process data with lfe.

Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] [PATCH] tests: add tolerant variation for comparing the rewind result

2015-05-25 Thread Alexander E. Patrakov
25.05.2015 09:49, Hui Wang wrote: On 32bits OS, this test case fails. The reason is when rewinding to the middle of a block, some of float parameters in the saved_state are stored in the memory from FPU registers, and those parameters will be used for next time to process data with lfe. Here if

Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] [PATCH] tests: add tolerant variation for comparing the rewind result

2015-05-25 Thread hwang4
On 2015年05月25日 14:40, David Henningsson wrote: On 2015-05-25 06:49, Hui Wang wrote: On 32bits OS, this test case fails. The reason is when rewinding to the middle of a block, some of float parameters in the saved_state are stored in the memory from FPU registers, and those parameters will

Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] [PATCH] tests: add tolerant variation for comparing the rewind result

2015-05-25 Thread hwang4
On 2015年05月25日 14:10, Alexander E. Patrakov wrote: 25.05.2015 09:49, Hui Wang wrote: On 32bits OS, this test case fails. The reason is when rewinding to the middle of a block, some of float parameters in the saved_state are stored in the memory from FPU registers, and those parameters will be

Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] [PATCH] tests: add tolerant variation for comparing the rewind result

2015-05-25 Thread Arun Raghavan
On 25 May 2015 at 12:49, hwang4 hui.w...@canonical.com wrote: On 2015年05月25日 14:40, David Henningsson wrote: On 2015-05-25 06:49, Hui Wang wrote: On 32bits OS, this test case fails. The reason is when rewinding to the middle of a block, some of float parameters in the saved_state are

Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] [PATCH] tests: add tolerant variation for comparing the rewind result

2015-05-25 Thread David Henningsson
On 2015-05-25 14:57, Arun Raghavan wrote: On 25 May 2015 at 12:49, hwang4 hui.w...@canonical.com wrote: On 2015年05月25日 14:40, David Henningsson wrote: On 2015-05-25 06:49, Hui Wang wrote: On 32bits OS, this test case fails. The reason is when rewinding to the middle of a block, some

[pulseaudio-discuss] [PATCH] tests: add tolerant variation for comparing the rewind result

2015-05-24 Thread Hui Wang
On 32bits OS, this test case fails. The reason is when rewinding to the middle of a block, some of float parameters in the saved_state are stored in the memory from FPU registers, and those parameters will be used for next time to process data with lfe. Here if FPU register is over 32bits, the