Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] [PATCH 0/3] resamplers

2014-10-24 Thread Alexander E. Patrakov
07.09.2014 15:48, Tanu Kaskinen wrote: Do we have some kind of a conclusion about whether the soxr and libavresample resamplers should be merged? If I understood correctly, the libavresample resampler appears to be somehow broken, so I guess that should not be merged until the brokenness is

Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] [PATCH 0/3] resamplers

2014-09-07 Thread Tanu Kaskinen
On Sun, 2014-08-24 at 13:35 +0600, Alexander E. Patrakov wrote: 04.08.2014 19:29, I wrote: Anyway, I think that the task of objectively testing the resampler speed and quality also needs to be done, in order to provide such justifications. Please see

Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] [PATCH 0/3] resamplers

2014-09-07 Thread Alexander E. Patrakov
[sent only to Tanu by mistake, resending to the list] 07.09.2014 15:48, Tanu Kaskinen wrote: On Sun, 2014-08-24 at 13:35 +0600, Alexander E. Patrakov wrote: 04.08.2014 19:29, I wrote: Anyway, I think that the task of objectively testing the resampler speed and quality also needs to be done,

Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] [PATCH 0/3] resamplers

2014-09-07 Thread Tanu Kaskinen
On Sun, 2014-09-07 at 16:32 +0600, Alexander E. Patrakov wrote: [sent only to Tanu by mistake, resending to the list] 07.09.2014 15:48, Tanu Kaskinen wrote: On Sun, 2014-08-24 at 13:35 +0600, Alexander E. Patrakov wrote: 04.08.2014 19:29, I wrote: Anyway, I think that the task of

Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] [PATCH 0/3] resamplers

2014-08-24 Thread Alexander E. Patrakov
04.08.2014 19:29, I wrote: Anyway, I think that the task of objectively testing the resampler speed and quality also needs to be done, in order to provide such justifications. Please see http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/pulseaudio-discuss/2014-February/019968.html for the formulation.

[pulseaudio-discuss] [PATCH 0/3] resamplers

2014-08-04 Thread Peter Meerwald
Hello, this patch series splits up the resampler implementation found in pulsecore into separate files and adds two new resampler implementations: soxr and libavresample the work was mostly done by poljar (Damir Jelić) during GSoC'13, this is just a rebase my goal would be to establish

Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] [PATCH 0/3] resamplers

2014-08-04 Thread Alexander E. Patrakov
04.08.2014 18:40, Peter Meerwald wrote: Hello, this patch series splits up the resampler implementation found in pulsecore into separate files and adds two new resampler implementations: soxr and libavresample the work was mostly done by poljar (Damir Jelić) during GSoC'13, this is just a

Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] [PATCH 0/3] resamplers

2014-08-04 Thread Peter Meerwald
Hello Alexander, my goal would be to establish libavresample as the new default resampler and drop the ffmpeg code copied into PA currently; don't worry, this would be further work based on the feedback received :) This conflicts with my goal of writing and getting a rewindable

Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] [PATCH 0/3] resamplers

2014-08-04 Thread Alexander E. Patrakov
04.08.2014 19:05, Peter Meerwald wrote: Hello Alexander, my goal would be to establish libavresample as the new default resampler and drop the ffmpeg code copied into PA currently; don't worry, this would be further work based on the feedback received :) This conflicts with my goal of

Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] [PATCH 0/3] resamplers

2014-08-04 Thread Arun Raghavan
On Mon, 2014-08-04 at 14:40 +0200, Peter Meerwald wrote: Hello, this patch series splits up the resampler implementation found in pulsecore into separate files and adds two new resampler implementations: soxr and libavresample the work was mostly done by poljar (Damir Jelić) during

Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] [PATCH 0/3] resamplers

2014-08-04 Thread Peter Meerwald
Hello Arun, the work was mostly done by poljar (Damir Jelić) during GSoC'13, this is just a rebase my goal would be to establish libavresample as the new default resampler and drop the ffmpeg code copied into PA currently; don't worry, this would be further work based on the