On Sat, 2016-08-20 at 17:39 +0200, Georg Chini wrote:
> On 20.08.2016 17:24, Tanu Kaskinen wrote:
> >
> > On Sun, 2016-06-05 at 21:05 +0200, Georg Chini wrote:
> > >
> > > The current loopback controller can produce a rate jump of up to 1% at
> > > startup. This
> > > might be audible, so
On 20.08.2016 17:24, Tanu Kaskinen wrote:
On Sun, 2016-06-05 at 21:05 +0200, Georg Chini wrote:
The current loopback controller can produce a rate jump of up to 1% at startup.
This
might be audible, so implement a similar controller that will be used in the
initial
iterations and has a 2‰
On Sun, 2016-06-05 at 21:05 +0200, Georg Chini wrote:
> The current loopback controller can produce a rate jump of up to 1% at
> startup. This
> might be audible, so implement a similar controller that will be used in the
> initial
> iterations and has a 2‰ limit to the step size. Once the
The current loopback controller can produce a rate jump of up to 1% at startup.
This
might be audible, so implement a similar controller that will be used in the
initial
iterations and has a 2‰ limit to the step size. Once the original controller
takes
over, step size is limited to 2.01‰. Proof
