On Mon, 2013-03-25 at 19:24 +, Arun Raghavan wrote:
> I wouldn't look at using GStreamer in pulsecore. It wouldn't act as a
> native protocol replacement. Instead, I visualise things working
> something like this:
>
> -
> C | |
> l | | --
> i --->
On Mon, 2013-03-25 at 16:19 +, Toby St Clere Smithe wrote:
> Hi Arun,
>
> Thanks for your message. I'm going to reply to you first, and then reply
> to David.
>
> Arun Raghavan writes:
> > Having means of doing non-PCM streaming would definitely be desirable.
> > That said, though, I'm a bit
On Mon, 2013-03-25 at 16:51 +, Arun Raghavan wrote:
> On Mon, 2013-03-25 at 18:09 +0200, Tanu Kaskinen wrote:
> [...]
> > > The simplest idea I can think of to deal with this meaningfully is to
> > > wrap a sink/source around a GStreamer pipeline to offload all that work
> > > that we don't wa
On Mon, 2013-03-25 at 18:09 +0200, Tanu Kaskinen wrote:
[...]
> > The simplest idea I can think of to deal with this meaningfully is to
> > wrap a sink/source around a GStreamer pipeline to offload all that work
> > that we don't want to duplicate in PulseAudio .
> >
> > On the sink side, we'd ho
Hi Tanu,
Tanu Kaskinen writes:
> I like the idea of offloading stuff to GStreamer very much.
So do I. What do you think about my idea of integrating GStreamer as
tightly as possible?
> Do you follow GStreamer development closely? If I've understood
> correctly, GStreamer hasn't supported rewind
Hi Arun,
Thanks for your message. I'm going to reply to you first, and then reply
to David.
Arun Raghavan writes:
> Having means of doing non-PCM streaming would definitely be desirable.
> That said, though, I'm a bit wary of introducing codec and RTP
> dependencies in PulseAudio (currently we
On Mon, 2013-03-25 at 13:23 +, Arun Raghavan wrote:
> On Sat, 2013-03-23 at 11:11 +, Toby Smithe wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I have a fairly free summer coming up, and thought it would be nice to
> > participate in GSoC. For a while I've been interested in PulseAudio, and
> > I have an idea for
On Sat, 2013-03-23 at 11:11 +, Toby Smithe wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have a fairly free summer coming up, and thought it would be nice to
> participate in GSoC. For a while I've been interested in PulseAudio, and
> I have an idea for a project. I wonder if you might say whether you
> think it plausib
On 03/25/2013 08:57 AM, Ian Malone wrote:
On 25 March 2013 06:13, David Henningsson
wrote:
On 03/23/2013 12:11 PM, Toby Smithe wrote:
becomes impractical, with drops and latency problems. A while ago, I
looked into implementing Opus compression for the network streams, but
never had a chanc
On 25 March 2013 06:13, David Henningsson
wrote:
> On 03/23/2013 12:11 PM, Toby Smithe wrote:
>> becomes impractical, with drops and latency problems. A while ago, I
>> looked into implementing Opus compression for the network streams, but
>> never had a chance. I think Opus would make the ideal
On 23 March 2013 11:11, Toby Smithe wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have a fairly free summer coming up, and thought it would be nice to
> participate in GSoC. For a while I've been interested in PulseAudio, and
> I have an idea for a project. I wonder if you might say whether you
> think it plausible.
>
> I u
On 03/23/2013 12:11 PM, Toby Smithe wrote:
Hi,
I have a fairly free summer coming up, and thought it would be nice to
participate in GSoC. For a while I've been interested in PulseAudio, and
I have an idea for a project. I wonder if you might say whether you
think it plausible.
I use PulseAudio
On Sat, March 23, 2013 5:39 pm, Toby St Clere Smithe wrote:
> When I did my research into codec choice around 9 months ago, I looked
> into FLAC, along with lossless codecs like Vorbis. Off the top of my
> head, I can't remember the details exactly, but my criteria were quite
> straightforward: f
Hi Thomas,
Thomas Martitz writes:
> I think this is a great project idea. I've been suffering from the
> problems you mentioned as well. However I think a lossless codec
> should be considered. Lossy codecs might not be acceptable for lots of
> people and a lossless codec might improve things su
Am 23.03.2013 12:11, schrieb Toby Smithe:
Hi,
I have a fairly free summer coming up, and thought it would be nice to
participate in GSoC. For a while I've been interested in PulseAudio, and
I have an idea for a project. I wonder if you might say whether you
think it plausible.
I use PulseAudio'
Hi,
I have a fairly free summer coming up, and thought it would be nice to
participate in GSoC. For a while I've been interested in PulseAudio, and
I have an idea for a project. I wonder if you might say whether you
think it plausible.
I use PulseAudio's native protocol streaming quite a lot, and
Hello,
I created a wiki page for this year's Google Summer of Code, including a
list of project ideas (currently empty, but I'll add a couple ideas
soon): http://www.freedesktop.org/wiki/Software/PulseAudio/GSoC2013
What features are missing from PulseAudio? Propose your pet peeves as
GSoC projec
17 matches
Mail list logo
