Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] Google ChromeOS reinventing the wheel, ignoring PulseAudio

2011-10-07 Thread Dylan Reid
On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 7:03 AM, pierre-louis.boss...@linux.intel.comwrote: I've attached the PA config files I am using, along with the log output(pulselog). The most suspicious thing in there is the failure to get RT scheduling. Is there something obviously wrong with the configs

Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] Google ChromeOS reinventing the wheel, ignoring PulseAudio

2011-10-07 Thread Pierre-Louis Bossart
Makes sense, I'll take a look at what pacat is actually filling the buffer attributes with and see if I can track this down. here are some additional explanations. Hang on to your hat, this isn't simple stuff: pacat has this 'process-time-msec' parameter which defines the min_req value (not a

Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] Google ChromeOS reinventing the wheel, ignoring PulseAudio

2011-10-03 Thread Baek Chang
On Mon, Oct 3, 2011 at 5:04 AM, Mark Brown broo...@sirena.org.uk wrote: On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 08:23:46PM +0200, David Henningsson wrote: First, look at the What's next section of the 1.0 notes [1]. That points out what we think are the most important shortcomings of PulseAudio

Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] Google ChromeOS reinventing the wheel, ignoring PulseAudio

2011-09-30 Thread Colin Guthrie
Hi, Mark has already posted a follow up, but I'll try and answer any questions you posed that he didn't cover. 'Twas brillig, and Taylor Hutt at 28/09/11 18:29 did gyre and gimble: Since we have decided not to use Pulse, prior to my time, it seemed prudent to continue with that

Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] Google ChromeOS reinventing the wheel, ignoring PulseAudio

2011-09-30 Thread David Henningsson
On 09/30/2011 10:44 AM, Colin Guthrie wrote: 'Twas brillig, and Taylor Hutt at 28/09/11 18:29 did gyre and gimble: In this case, I am part of a team working to make a shipping product, and there are time constraints which do not afford the time necessary to do that, _and_ to make forward

Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] Google ChromeOS reinventing the wheel, ignoring PulseAudio

2011-09-28 Thread Arun Raghavan
On Wed, 2011-09-28 at 10:02 +0100, Colin Guthrie wrote: Hi Taylor, [ I've CC'ed a couple other potentially interested parties ] 'Twas brillig, and Taylor Hutt at 27/09/11 21:56 did gyre and gimble: Hello folks, I am indeed the one doing the majority of the work on the ADHD system at

Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] Google ChromeOS reinventing the wheel, ignoring PulseAudio

2011-09-28 Thread Tanu Kaskinen
On Wed, 2011-09-28 at 12:02 +0300, Colin Guthrie wrote: We've also looked at UCM and decided that it wasn't right for our purposes, at least in the present state. FWIF PA will also support UCM in the near-ish future. In either case, if you need UCM-like features, I'd strongly advise you

Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] Google ChromeOS reinventing the wheel, ignoring PulseAudio

2011-09-28 Thread Taylor Hutt
On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 5:17 AM, Mark Brown broo...@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com wrote: On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 10:02:49AM +0100, Colin Guthrie wrote: 'Twas brillig, and Taylor Hutt at 27/09/11 21:56 did gyre and gimble: Hello folks, snip Since we have decided not to use Pulse,

Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] Google ChromeOS reinventing the wheel, ignoring PulseAudio

2011-09-28 Thread Mark Brown
On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 10:29:03AM -0700, Taylor Hutt wrote: In this case, I am part of a team working to make a shipping product, and there are time constraints which do not afford the time necessary to do that, _and_ to make forward progress to get the sound system working across a

[pulseaudio-discuss] Google ChromeOS reinventing the wheel, ignoring PulseAudio

2011-09-27 Thread Vlad
Dear PusleAudio developers, I'd like to let you know that Google ChromeOS recently started a brand new project called ADHD, which from what I can tell aims to do the same thing that PulseAudio already does, bypassing it in favor of interacting directly with ALSA:

Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] Google ChromeOS reinventing the wheel, ignoring PulseAudio

2011-09-27 Thread Rémi Denis-Courmont
Le mardi 27 septembre 2011 17:27:14 Arun Raghavan, vous avez écrit : Do you have any more details? Seems to be more of a policy daemon than an audio server. Isn't audio policy daemon just a fancier name for (modern) audio server? Does PulseAudio not implement audio policy? Sure, PulseAudio

Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] Google ChromeOS reinventing the wheel, ignoring PulseAudio

2011-09-27 Thread Tanu Kaskinen
On Tue, 2011-09-27 at 18:02 +0300, Rémi Denis-Courmont wrote: Le mardi 27 septembre 2011 17:27:14 Arun Raghavan, vous avez écrit : Do you have any more details? Seems to be more of a policy daemon than an audio server. Isn't audio policy daemon just a fancier name for (modern) audio