Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] Underrunning null sink

2018-10-24 Thread Travis Brown
After digging into this a bit more, it appears that the latency on the null sink is all over the place when pavucontrol is NOT running. For example, here is a case when it is not running: index: 2 name: driver: flags: DECIBEL_VOLUME LATENCY DYNAMIC_LATENCY

Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] Underrunning null sink

2018-10-24 Thread Travis Brown
After playing around with this for about 6 hours, I found some interesting data. The latency on the g722 (since renamed to ip_mcast) null-sink hovers around 20mS when I have pavucontrol running, and around 600mS when I don’t have it running. Since G722 requires pretty consistent 20Ms packets,

[pulseaudio-discuss] Underrunning null sink

2018-10-24 Thread Travis Brown
Hi, I am using Pulseaudio to send data from an application to 3 different outputs simultaneously: HDMI, analog output and a G.722 RTP stream. To accomplish this, I set up a null sink call g722 using the following setting in be default.pa: load-module module-null-sink sink_name=g722