On 30.04.19 23:37, Alexander E. Patrakov wrote:
вт, 30 апр. 2019 г. в 23:46, Georg Chini :
On 30.04.19 19:23, Alexander E. Patrakov wrote:
Please don't treat the FIR for module-virtual-surround-sink as a set
of reconfigurable parameters. At least for now. Just hard-code the
contents of
вт, 30 апр. 2019 г. в 23:46, Georg Chini :
>
> On 30.04.19 19:23, Alexander E. Patrakov wrote:
> >> /* If set, this function is called in thread context when an update
> >> of the
> >>* filter parameters is requested, may be NULL. The function must
> >> replace
> >>* the
On 30.04.19 20:46, Georg Chini wrote:
On 30.04.19 19:23, Alexander E. Patrakov wrote:
/* Callback to process a chunk of data by the filter. May be
NULL */
void (*process_chunk)(float *src, float *dst, unsigned count,
void
*filter_handle);
/* Callback to retrieve
On 30.04.19 19:23, Alexander E. Patrakov wrote:
вт, 30 апр. 2019 г. в 16:31, Georg Chini :
uint64_t min_latency; /* Minimum latency
allowed for the sink, 0 if unused */
uint64_t max_latency; /* Maximum latency
allowed for the sink, 0 if unused
вт, 30 апр. 2019 г. в 16:31, Georg Chini :
> uint64_t min_latency; /* Minimum latency
> allowed for the sink, 0 if unused */
> uint64_t max_latency; /* Maximum latency
> allowed for the sink, 0 if unused */
Why would these fields be needed?
>
On 27.04.19 17:14, Georg Chini wrote:
On 27.04.19 12:55, Georg Chini wrote:
On 27.04.19 12:04, Tanu Kaskinen wrote:
On Fri, 2019-04-26 at 11:40 +0200, Georg Chini wrote:
On 26.04.19 10:56, Tanu Kaskinen wrote:
On Tue, 2019-04-23 at 21:20 +0200, Georg Chini wrote:
The current scheme for
On 27.04.19 12:55, Georg Chini wrote:
On 27.04.19 12:04, Tanu Kaskinen wrote:
On Fri, 2019-04-26 at 11:40 +0200, Georg Chini wrote:
On 26.04.19 10:56, Tanu Kaskinen wrote:
On Tue, 2019-04-23 at 21:20 +0200, Georg Chini wrote:
The current scheme for
updating
parameters I have in mind should
On 27.04.19 12:04, Tanu Kaskinen wrote:
On Fri, 2019-04-26 at 11:40 +0200, Georg Chini wrote:
On 26.04.19 10:56, Tanu Kaskinen wrote:
On Tue, 2019-04-23 at 21:20 +0200, Georg Chini wrote:
The current scheme for
updating
parameters I have in mind should work for any of the existing filters
and
On Fri, 2019-04-26 at 11:40 +0200, Georg Chini wrote:
> On 26.04.19 10:56, Tanu Kaskinen wrote:
> > On Tue, 2019-04-23 at 21:20 +0200, Georg Chini wrote:
> > > The current scheme for
> > > updating
> > > parameters I have in mind should work for any of the existing filters
> > > and relies on
> >
On 26.04.19 11:40, Georg Chini wrote:
On 26.04.19 10:56, Tanu Kaskinen wrote:
On Tue, 2019-04-23 at 21:20 +0200, Georg Chini wrote:
The current scheme for
updating
parameters I have in mind should work for any of the existing filters
and relies on
passing around parameter structures:
On 26.04.19 10:56, Tanu Kaskinen wrote:
On Tue, 2019-04-23 at 21:20 +0200, Georg Chini wrote:
The current scheme for
updating
parameters I have in mind should work for any of the existing filters
and relies on
passing around parameter structures:
/* The following functions can be
On Tue, 2019-04-23 at 21:20 +0200, Georg Chini wrote:
> On 22.04.19 09:34, Tanu Kaskinen wrote:
> > On Sat, 2019-04-20 at 11:38 +0200, Georg Chini wrote:
> > > PA uses malloc() in the IO-thread, so are we doing things wrong?
> > > I think using malloc() when a parameter changes is not interfering
On Mon, 2019-04-22 at 11:23 +0200, Georg Chini wrote:
> On 22.04.19 09:34, Tanu Kaskinen wrote:
> > On Sat, 2019-04-20 at 11:38 +0200, Georg Chini wrote:
> > > PA uses malloc() in the IO-thread, so are we doing things wrong?
> > > I think using malloc() when a parameter changes is not interfering
On 22.04.19 09:34, Tanu Kaskinen wrote:
On Sat, 2019-04-20 at 11:38 +0200, Georg Chini wrote:
PA uses malloc() in the IO-thread, so are we doing things wrong?
I think using malloc() when a parameter changes is not interfering
with real-time operation because the filter must be reset after
a
On Sat, 2019-04-20 at 11:38 +0200, Georg Chini wrote:
> On 20.04.19 11:06, Tanu Kaskinen wrote:
> > On Fri, 2019-04-19 at 17:52 +0200, Georg Chini wrote:
> > > On 19.04.19 16:56, Tanu Kaskinen wrote:
> > > > Changing the number of eq bands isn't quite like changing regular
> > > > control values.
сб, 20 апр. 2019 г. в 15:20, Georg Chini :
>
> On 20.04.19 12:14, Alexander E. Patrakov wrote:
> > [forgot to CC the list - sorry for any duplicates]
> >
> > сб, 20 апр. 2019 г. в 14:39, Georg Chini :
> >
> >> I think using malloc() when a parameter changes is not interfering
> >> with real-time
On 20.04.19 12:14, Alexander E. Patrakov wrote:
[forgot to CC the list - sorry for any duplicates]
сб, 20 апр. 2019 г. в 14:39, Georg Chini :
I think using malloc() when a parameter changes is not interfering
with real-time operation because the filter must be reset after
a parameter change
On 20.04.19 12:14, Alexander E. Patrakov wrote:
[forgot to CC the list - sorry for any duplicates]
сб, 20 апр. 2019 г. в 14:39, Georg Chini :
I think using malloc() when a parameter changes is not interfering
with real-time operation because the filter must be reset after
a parameter change
[forgot to CC the list - sorry for any duplicates]
сб, 20 апр. 2019 г. в 14:39, Georg Chini :
> I think using malloc() when a parameter changes is not interfering
> with real-time operation because the filter must be reset after
> a parameter change anyway.
The parameter changes allowed during
On 20.04.19 11:06, Tanu Kaskinen wrote:
On Fri, 2019-04-19 at 17:52 +0200, Georg Chini wrote:
On 19.04.19 16:56, Tanu Kaskinen wrote:
On Fri, 2019-04-19 at 12:03 +0200, Georg Chini wrote:
On 19.04.19 11:13, Tanu Kaskinen wrote:
On Tue, 2019-04-16 at 21:40 +0200, Georg Chini wrote:
On
сб, 20 апр. 2019 г. в 05:54, Georg Chini :
> But what you are basically saying is that the equalizer does
> not hold what Andrea claims it can do and that it is only useful
> as a 10-band equalizer. I wonder why her work was then
> accepted as a master thesis.
I don't know the Italian
On Fri, 2019-04-19 at 17:52 +0200, Georg Chini wrote:
> On 19.04.19 16:56, Tanu Kaskinen wrote:
> > On Fri, 2019-04-19 at 12:03 +0200, Georg Chini wrote:
> > > On 19.04.19 11:13, Tanu Kaskinen wrote:
> > > > On Tue, 2019-04-16 at 21:40 +0200, Georg Chini wrote:
> > > > > On 16.04.19 19:19, Tanu
On 20.04.19 01:02, Alexander E. Patrakov wrote:
сб, 20 апр. 2019 г. в 00:15, Georg Chini :
On 19.04.19 18:23, Alexander E. Patrakov wrote:
пт, 19 апр. 2019 г. в 14:13, Tanu Kaskinen :
If the plugin gets the number of bands during the
initialization, it can create the appropriate number of
сб, 20 апр. 2019 г. в 00:15, Georg Chini :
>
> On 19.04.19 18:23, Alexander E. Patrakov wrote:
> > пт, 19 апр. 2019 г. в 14:13, Tanu Kaskinen :
> >> If the plugin gets the number of bands during the
> >> initialization, it can create the appropriate number of non-array
> >> control ports.
пн, 8 апр. 2019 г. в 15:05, Alexander E. Patrakov :
>
> пн, 8 апр. 2019 г. в 13:08, Alexander E. Patrakov :
>
> > I have looked again at the paper, and have a DSP question.
> >
> > The thesis starts with designing a shelf filter. That is, a filter
> > that contains a flat area at low frequencies,
On 19.04.19 18:23, Alexander E. Patrakov wrote:
пт, 19 апр. 2019 г. в 14:13, Tanu Kaskinen :
If the plugin gets the number of bands during the
initialization, it can create the appropriate number of non-array
control ports. Interleaved audio ports aren't needed either, because
PulseAudio can do
пт, 19 апр. 2019 г. в 14:13, Tanu Kaskinen :
> If the plugin gets the number of bands during the
> initialization, it can create the appropriate number of non-array
> control ports. Interleaved audio ports aren't needed either, because
> PulseAudio can do the deinterleaving before passing the
On 19.04.19 16:56, Tanu Kaskinen wrote:
On Fri, 2019-04-19 at 12:03 +0200, Georg Chini wrote:
On 19.04.19 11:13, Tanu Kaskinen wrote:
On Tue, 2019-04-16 at 21:40 +0200, Georg Chini wrote:
On 16.04.19 19:19, Tanu Kaskinen wrote:
On Thu, 2019-04-11 at 20:42 +0200, Georg Chini wrote:
On
On Fri, 2019-04-19 at 12:03 +0200, Georg Chini wrote:
> On 19.04.19 11:13, Tanu Kaskinen wrote:
> > On Tue, 2019-04-16 at 21:40 +0200, Georg Chini wrote:
> > > On 16.04.19 19:19, Tanu Kaskinen wrote:
> > > > On Thu, 2019-04-11 at 20:42 +0200, Georg Chini wrote:
> > > > > On 11.04.19 19:36, Tanu
On 19.04.19 11:13, Tanu Kaskinen wrote:
On Tue, 2019-04-16 at 21:40 +0200, Georg Chini wrote:
On 16.04.19 19:19, Tanu Kaskinen wrote:
On Thu, 2019-04-11 at 20:42 +0200, Georg Chini wrote:
On 11.04.19 19:36, Tanu Kaskinen wrote:
If you want a better plugin standard, are you aware of LV2
and
On Tue, 2019-04-16 at 21:40 +0200, Georg Chini wrote:
> On 16.04.19 19:19, Tanu Kaskinen wrote:
> > On Thu, 2019-04-11 at 20:42 +0200, Georg Chini wrote:
> > > On 11.04.19 19:36, Tanu Kaskinen wrote:
> > > > If you want a better plugin standard, are you aware of LV2
> > > > and PipeWire's SPA (the
On 16.04.19 21:40, Georg Chini wrote:
On 16.04.19 19:19, Tanu Kaskinen wrote:
On Thu, 2019-04-11 at 20:42 +0200, Georg Chini wrote:
On 11.04.19 19:36, Tanu Kaskinen wrote:
On Thu, 2019-04-11 at 15:16 +0200, Georg Chini wrote:
On 08.04.19 09:27, Georg Chini wrote:
On 05.04.19 13:29, Tanu
On 16.04.19 19:19, Tanu Kaskinen wrote:
On Thu, 2019-04-11 at 20:42 +0200, Georg Chini wrote:
On 11.04.19 19:36, Tanu Kaskinen wrote:
On Thu, 2019-04-11 at 15:16 +0200, Georg Chini wrote:
On 08.04.19 09:27, Georg Chini wrote:
On 05.04.19 13:29, Tanu Kaskinen wrote:
On Tue, 2019-04-02 at
On Thu, 2019-04-11 at 20:42 +0200, Georg Chini wrote:
> On 11.04.19 19:36, Tanu Kaskinen wrote:
> > On Thu, 2019-04-11 at 15:16 +0200, Georg Chini wrote:
> > > On 08.04.19 09:27, Georg Chini wrote:
> > > > On 05.04.19 13:29, Tanu Kaskinen wrote:
> > > > > On Tue, 2019-04-02 at 20:28 +0200, Georg
On 11.04.19 19:36, Tanu Kaskinen wrote:
On Thu, 2019-04-11 at 15:16 +0200, Georg Chini wrote:
On 08.04.19 09:27, Georg Chini wrote:
On 05.04.19 13:29, Tanu Kaskinen wrote:
On Tue, 2019-04-02 at 20:28 +0200, Georg Chini wrote:
On 06.11.18 22:14, Andrea A wrote:
Hi Andrea,
maybe there is
On Thu, 2019-04-11 at 15:16 +0200, Georg Chini wrote:
> On 08.04.19 09:27, Georg Chini wrote:
> > On 05.04.19 13:29, Tanu Kaskinen wrote:
> > > On Tue, 2019-04-02 at 20:28 +0200, Georg Chini wrote:
> > > > On 06.11.18 22:14, Andrea A wrote:
> > > > > Thanks a lot for the reply
> > > > >
> > > > >
пн, 8 апр. 2019 г. в 13:08, Alexander E. Patrakov :
> I have looked again at the paper, and have a DSP question.
>
> The thesis starts with designing a shelf filter. That is, a filter
> that contains a flat area at low frequencies, a flat area at high
> frequencies (but with a different gain),
пн, 8 апр. 2019 г. в 12:27, Georg Chini :
>
> On 05.04.19 13:29, Tanu Kaskinen wrote:
> > On Tue, 2019-04-02 at 20:28 +0200, Georg Chini wrote:
> >> On 06.11.18 22:14, Andrea A wrote:
> >>> Thanks a lot for the reply
> >>>
> If the preset files are expected to be shared between users, then
On 05.04.19 13:29, Tanu Kaskinen wrote:
On Tue, 2019-04-02 at 20:28 +0200, Georg Chini wrote:
On 06.11.18 22:14, Andrea A wrote:
Thanks a lot for the reply
If the preset files are expected to be shared between users, then the
database.h stuff isn't good, because different users can have
On Tue, 2019-04-02 at 20:28 +0200, Georg Chini wrote:
> On 06.11.18 22:14, Andrea A wrote:
> > Thanks a lot for the reply
> >
> > > If the preset files are expected to be shared between users, then the
> > database.h stuff isn't good, because different users can have their
> > pulseaudio
On 06.11.18 22:14, Andrea A wrote:
Thanks a lot for the reply
>If the preset files are expected to be shared between users, then the
database.h stuff isn't good, because different users can have their
pulseaudio configured with different database formats. I like the "ini-
style" configuration
Just some comments on this thread, mainly towards Andrea.
I tried looking over the thesis, but Italian is not my language, and
google translate seems to give up midway through.
Certainly welcome new blood and a new project to make equalization a
better experience. Extra points for making it a
On Tue, 2018-11-06 at 21:14 +, Andrea A wrote:
> Thanks a lot for the reply
>
> > If the preset files are expected to be shared between users, then the
> database.h stuff isn't good, because different users can have their
> pulseaudio configured with different database formats. I like the
Andrea A :
> My fear is that a LADSPA plugin will be too hard to use for a lot of desktop
> users. I think that a GNU desktop user would like to have a fully working
> audio equalizer in his distribution and PA is default in almost all GNU
> distributions. Configuring a LADSPA plugin may be
Andrea A :
>
> I’ve just added the thesis link at the end of the first module comment, I can
> change its position if you want:
>
> https://github.com/andrea993/audioeqpro/blob/afb986711f5125083351cc4f7dac1ca84409f501/pulsemodule/module-eqpro-sink.c#L21
Thank you very much, I will look. It will
45 matches
Mail list logo
