> Ok, thanks for looking into it :)
>
> I've sent a message to the FSF (LGPL authors) to ask for a
> clarification from them.
>
> I'll have a think about whether it is at all feasible to either split
> the documentation out like that, or to build a list of copyright
> owners
> that would need to
> The documentation is copyrighted, and since there are no special
> exceptions mentioned anywhere, it's covered by LGPL like everything
> else. I now read what the license says, and I got the impression that
> if you copy the documentation, you have created a derivative work,
> and the whole work
On Mon, 2019-08-19 at 22:15 +0100, jnq...@gmail.com wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I don't know if you remember me, but I'm the author of the Rust binding
> (https://github.com/jnqnfe/pulse-binding-rust) for PA.
>
> I am a little uncertain about licensing with regards to my binding,
> specifically whether it
