Greetings,
I'm running Debian Buster and I have a 1/8" audio jack. I need the sink to
be an analog output to send off to some other device. Things work great,
except for when the system reboots, it comes up configured as a digital
soundcard:
Digital Stereo (IEC958)
Here is a diff between a
сб, 20 апр. 2019 г. в 05:54, Georg Chini :
> But what you are basically saying is that the equalizer does
> not hold what Andrea claims it can do and that it is only useful
> as a 10-band equalizer. I wonder why her work was then
> accepted as a master thesis.
I don't know the Italian
On Fri, 2019-04-19 at 17:52 +0200, Georg Chini wrote:
> On 19.04.19 16:56, Tanu Kaskinen wrote:
> > On Fri, 2019-04-19 at 12:03 +0200, Georg Chini wrote:
> > > On 19.04.19 11:13, Tanu Kaskinen wrote:
> > > > On Tue, 2019-04-16 at 21:40 +0200, Georg Chini wrote:
> > > > > On 16.04.19 19:19, Tanu
On Sat, 2019-04-06 at 11:16 +0200, Pali Rohár wrote:
> This patch provides support for FastStream codec in bluetooth A2DP profile.
> FastStream codec is bi-directional, which means that support both music
> playback and microphone voice at the same time.
>
> FastStream codec is just SBC codec
On Saturday 20 April 2019 11:37:56 Tanu Kaskinen wrote:
> On Sat, 2019-04-06 at 11:16 +0200, Pali Rohár wrote:
> > This patch provides support for FastStream codec in bluetooth A2DP profile.
> > FastStream codec is bi-directional, which means that support both music
> > playback and microphone
On Friday 19 April 2019 12:52:56 Pali Rohár wrote:
> On Friday 19 April 2019 11:41:22 Tanu Kaskinen wrote:
> > On Sat, 2019-04-06 at 11:16 +0200, Pali Rohár wrote:
> > > +static size_t decode_buffer(void *codec_info, const uint8_t
> > > *input_buffer, size_t input_size, uint8_t *output_buffer,
On Friday 19 April 2019 14:30:24 Tanu Kaskinen wrote:
> On Fri, 2019-04-19 at 12:52 +0200, Pali Rohár wrote:
> > On Friday 19 April 2019 11:41:22 Tanu Kaskinen wrote:
> > > On Sat, 2019-04-06 at 11:16 +0200, Pali Rohár wrote:
> > > > +static size_t decode_buffer(void *codec_info, const uint8_t
>
On 20.04.19 12:14, Alexander E. Patrakov wrote:
[forgot to CC the list - sorry for any duplicates]
сб, 20 апр. 2019 г. в 14:39, Georg Chini :
I think using malloc() when a parameter changes is not interfering
with real-time operation because the filter must be reset after
a parameter change
On 20.04.19 12:14, Alexander E. Patrakov wrote:
[forgot to CC the list - sorry for any duplicates]
сб, 20 апр. 2019 г. в 14:39, Georg Chini :
I think using malloc() when a parameter changes is not interfering
with real-time operation because the filter must be reset after
a parameter change
On Monday 17 September 2018 15:02:18 Tanu Kaskinen wrote:
> > > > +sbc_info->min_bitpool = config->min_bitpool;
> > > > +sbc_info->max_bitpool = config->max_bitpool;
> > > > +
> > > > +/* Set minimum bitpool for source to get the maximum possible
> > > > block_size */
> > > > +
On 20.04.19 11:06, Tanu Kaskinen wrote:
On Fri, 2019-04-19 at 17:52 +0200, Georg Chini wrote:
On 19.04.19 16:56, Tanu Kaskinen wrote:
On Fri, 2019-04-19 at 12:03 +0200, Georg Chini wrote:
On 19.04.19 11:13, Tanu Kaskinen wrote:
On Tue, 2019-04-16 at 21:40 +0200, Georg Chini wrote:
On
[forgot to CC the list - sorry for any duplicates]
сб, 20 апр. 2019 г. в 14:39, Georg Chini :
> I think using malloc() when a parameter changes is not interfering
> with real-time operation because the filter must be reset after
> a parameter change anyway.
The parameter changes allowed during
сб, 20 апр. 2019 г. в 15:20, Georg Chini :
>
> On 20.04.19 12:14, Alexander E. Patrakov wrote:
> > [forgot to CC the list - sorry for any duplicates]
> >
> > сб, 20 апр. 2019 г. в 14:39, Georg Chini :
> >
> >> I think using malloc() when a parameter changes is not interfering
> >> with real-time
13 matches
Mail list logo
