On Thu, 11 Aug 2016, at 12:59 AM, Thomas Petazzoni wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Wed, 10 Aug 2016 20:34:54 +0530, Arun Raghavan wrote:
>
> > Hmm, this one's a bit tricky. Again, changing our copy of the webrtc.org
> > code will make maintenance a pain, so I'd prefer for such changes to go
> > upstream.
On Fri, 2016-08-19 at 22:33 +0300, Tanu Kaskinen wrote:
> On Thu, 2016-08-18 at 11:14 -0700, James Bottomley wrote:
> > When all headsets supported both HSP and HFP, life was good and we
> > only needed to implement HSP in the native backend. Unfortunately
> > some headsets have started supporting
Hello,
I'm trying to get a SPK-ProHT Bluetooth speaker and headset working on an
embedded Linux board but when I failed to use pacmd set-card-profile to
choose headset_head_unit profile. Checking pulseaudio lof file, it seems
backend-native cannot connect to SCO socket. Sorry this is a very long m
On Thu, 2016-08-18 at 11:14 -0700, James Bottomley wrote:
> When all headsets supported both HSP and HFP, life was good and we
> only needed to implement HSP in the native backend. Unfortunately
> some headsets have started supporting HFP only. Unfortuantely, we
> can't simply switch to HFP only
On Thu, 2016-08-18 at 08:41 +1000, Bernd Wechner wrote:
> c) at the pulseaudio level there are already description properties
> available (on sinks, cards and ports) and all it would take to allow
> tweaking them is an interface of sorts (update-sink-description,
> update-card-description, updat
On Fri, 2016-08-19 at 20:24 +0300, Tanu Kaskinen wrote:
> On Thu, 2016-08-18 at 07:51 -0700, James Bottomley wrote:
> > I recently switched from a JBL Flip 2 which supports both HSP and
> > HFP
> > to an Ultimate Ears Boom 2 which is HFP only. Needless to say this
> > currently means that the Ulti
On Thu, 2016-08-18 at 07:51 -0700, James Bottomley wrote:
> I recently switched from a JBL Flip 2 which supports both HSP and HFP
> to an Ultimate Ears Boom 2 which is HFP only. Needless to say this
> currently means that the Ultimate Ears fails to work with pulseaudio
> because we only support HS
On Thu, 2016-08-18 at 18:17 +0200, Peter Meerwald-Stadler wrote:
> passing an invalid sample_spec to
> pa_sample_size_of_format(),
> pa_frame_size(),
> pa_bytes_per_second(),
> pa_bytes_to_usec(),
> pa_usec_to_bytes()
> currently gives a result of 0
>
> this is problematic as
> (a) it leads to man
On Thu, 2016-08-18 at 18:17 +0200, Peter Meerwald-Stadler wrote:
> if data->source is NULL, pa_source_output_new_data_set_source() may
> fail to set data->source;
> the false retval is ignored, leading to a NULL dereference in
> pa_source_get_state(data->source) below
>
> CID 1323590
> ---
> src/
On Thu, 2016-08-18 at 18:17 +0200, Peter Meerwald-Stadler wrote:
> if data->sink is NULL, pa_sink_input_new_data_set_sink() may fail to set
> data->sink;
> the false retval is ignored, leading to a NULL dereference in
> pa_sink_get_state(data->sink) below
>
> CID 1323591
> ---
> src/pulsecore/s
On Thu, 2016-08-18 at 18:17 +0200, Peter Meerwald-Stadler wrote:
> CID 1138482
> ---
> src/tests/stripnul.c | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
The commit message is lacking an explanation of why this is done, and
why 1024 is a good limit. If it's done to avoid overrun of the buffer,
it seems
On Thu, 2016-08-18 at 18:17 +0200, Peter Meerwald-Stadler wrote:
> instead of calling sysconf() directly, add function pa_page_size()
> which uses the guestimate 4096 in case sysconf(_SC_PAGE_SIZE) fails
>
> using PA_ONCE to only evaluate sysconf() once
>
> the name macro.h/.c is a bit unfortunat
On Thu, 2016-08-18 at 18:17 +0200, Peter Meerwald-Stadler wrote:
> read() can return a number of bytes read less than k
There seem to be other fixes too, which are not mentioned in the commit
message: handling of EAGAIN (but not EINTR - looks like pa_read() would
be suitable here too), fix for the
On Fri, 19 Aug 2016, at 01:17 PM, Rémi Denis-Courmont wrote:
> Le vendredi 19 août 2016, 12:16:57 Arun Raghavan a écrit :
> > On Fri, 19 Aug 2016, at 01:29 AM, Pierre-Louis Bossart wrote:
> > > On 8/18/16 11:43 AM, Rémi Denis-Courmont wrote:
> > > > Hello,
> > > >
> > > > For a number of
14 matches
Mail list logo
