On Thu, 2014-09-25 at 17:32 +0200, Colin Leroy wrote:
On Thu, 25 Sep 2014 17:25:58 +0200, Martin Blanchard tch...@gmx.com
wrote:
Hi Martin,
Subject: [PATCH] raop: Remove unimplemented code (PCM and AAC)
Thanks, applied pushed to my branch.
Note that the patch review status page[1]
[re-sending to the list]
On 28 September 2014 at 13h47, Tanu Kaskinen wrote:
Hi,
Subject: [PATCH] raop: Remove unimplemented code (PCM and AAC)
Thanks, applied pushed to my branch.
Note that the patch review status page[1] refers to a fixed set of
commits to make it clear
Hello Colin.
On Thu, 2014-09-18 at 15:27 +0200, Colin Leroy wrote:
On Thu, 18 Sep 2014 19:17:53 +0600, Alexander E. Patrakov
patra...@gmail.com wrote:
I had a look at the diff between the master and the end result. Too
much whitespace changes and other non-functional changes (e.g. I
On Thu, 25 Sep 2014 17:25:58 +0200, Martin Blanchard tch...@gmx.com
wrote:
Hi Martin,
Subject: [PATCH] raop: Remove unimplemented code (PCM and AAC)
Thanks, applied pushed to my branch.
--
Colin
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
On Thu, 18 Sep 2014 16:43:05 +0530, Arun Raghavan a...@accosted.net
wrote:
On 18 Sep 2014 15:35, Colin Leroy co...@colino.net wrote:
On Thu, 18 Sep 2014 11:10:30 +0200, Colin Leroy co...@colino.net
wrote:
So what's needed to start looking at pushing this upstream? I
don't have
18.09.2014 19:03, Colin Leroy wrote:
On Thu, 18 Sep 2014 16:43:05 +0530, Arun Raghavan a...@accosted.net
wrote:
On 18 Sep 2014 15:35, Colin Leroy co...@colino.net wrote:
On Thu, 18 Sep 2014 11:10:30 +0200, Colin Leroy co...@colino.net
wrote:
So what's needed to start looking at pushing
On Thu, 18 Sep 2014 19:17:53 +0600, Alexander E. Patrakov
patra...@gmail.com wrote:
I had a look at the diff between the master and the end result. Too
much whitespace changes and other non-functional changes (e.g. I
don't understand why the definition of struct userdata has to be
moved up in
18.09.2014 19:27, Colin Leroy wrote:
On Thu, 18 Sep 2014 19:17:53 +0600, Alexander E. Patrakov
patra...@gmail.com wrote:
I had a look at the diff between the master and the end result. Too
much whitespace changes and other non-functional changes (e.g. I
don't understand why the definition of
On Thu, 18 Sep 2014 19:37:49 +0600, Alexander E. Patrakov
patra...@gmail.com wrote:
Well, if you prefer to have them, then OK, let's have them (and only
them) at the beginning and only functional changes at the end. If
some patch adds badly-formatted code only to be fixed up later,
please
18.09.2014 19:44, Colin Leroy wrote:
On Thu, 18 Sep 2014 19:37:49 +0600, Alexander E. Patrakov
patra...@gmail.com wrote:
Well, if you prefer to have them, then OK, let's have them (and only
them) at the beginning and only functional changes at the end. If
some patch adds badly-formatted code
On Thu, 18 Sep 2014 19:52:15 +0600, Alexander E. Patrakov
patra...@gmail.com wrote:
That would be perfect.
[...]
Then git rebase -i master is your friend.
Thanks, that helped :)
Here's the updated result :
https://github.com/colinleroy/pulseaudio/compare/raop2-v2
HTH,
--
Colin
11 matches
Mail list logo
