On Sat, 8 Jun 2019, at 12:09 PM, Tanu Kaskinen wrote:
> On Thu, 2019-06-06 at 18:39 +0200, Arun Raghavan wrote:
[...]
> > I suggest we timebox this -- what we are able to confidently review
> > and get in over the next 2 weeks makes to go into master before the
> > freeze, the rest we can push to n
On Thu, 2019-06-06 at 18:39 +0200, Arun Raghavan wrote:
> On Wed, 5 Jun 2019, at 7:29 PM, Pali Rohár wrote:
> > On Wednesday 05 June 2019 09:57:01 Georg Chini wrote:
> > > On 04.06.19 19:42, Tanu Kaskinen wrote:
> > > > On Fri, 2019-05-31 at 16:59 +0300, Kai Vehmanen wrote:
> > > > > Hi all,
> > >
On Wed, 5 Jun 2019, at 7:29 PM, Pali Rohár wrote:
> On Wednesday 05 June 2019 09:57:01 Georg Chini wrote:
> > On 04.06.19 19:42, Tanu Kaskinen wrote:
> > > On Fri, 2019-05-31 at 16:59 +0300, Kai Vehmanen wrote:
> > > > Hi all,
> > > >
> > > > I've been testing pulse with the new Intel SOF [1] audi
On Wednesday 05 June 2019 09:57:01 Georg Chini wrote:
> On 04.06.19 19:42, Tanu Kaskinen wrote:
> > On Fri, 2019-05-31 at 16:59 +0300, Kai Vehmanen wrote:
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > I've been testing pulse with the new Intel SOF [1] audio drivers (that are
> > > going to 5.2 kernel).
> > >
> > > I
On 04.06.19 19:42, Tanu Kaskinen wrote:
On Fri, 2019-05-31 at 16:59 +0300, Kai Vehmanen wrote:
Hi all,
I've been testing pulse with the new Intel SOF [1] audio drivers (that are
going to 5.2 kernel).
In my tests, e.g. system suspend/stress tests work much better on latest
master of pulseaudio,
On Fri, 2019-05-31 at 16:59 +0300, Kai Vehmanen wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I've been testing pulse with the new Intel SOF [1] audio drivers (that are
> going to 5.2 kernel).
>
> In my tests, e.g. system suspend/stress tests work much better on latest
> master of pulseaudio, compared to test with late
Hi,
On Fri, May 31, 2019 at 04:59:02PM +0300, Kai Vehmanen wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I've been testing pulse with the new Intel SOF [1] audio drivers (that are
> going to 5.2 kernel).
>
> In my tests, e.g. system suspend/stress tests work much better on latest
> master of pulseaudio, compared to te
Hi all,
I've been testing pulse with the new Intel SOF [1] audio drivers (that are
going to 5.2 kernel).
In my tests, e.g. system suspend/stress tests work much better on latest
master of pulseaudio, compared to test with latest released Pulseaudio.
At least this patch in PA master has a big i
