On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 10:39 PM, Lennart Poettering
wrote:
> On Tue, 24.02.09 21:20, Colin Guthrie (gm...@colin.guthr.ie) wrote:
>
>> Hi Lennart,
>>
>> OK, so attached should be a screenie of the KDE settings window.
>>
>> As you can see, the idea is to list all the various detected h/w and
>> al
Hi,
I am reading its code and wondering why the filter_cb is needed to
handle ACLAdded
And ACLRemoved etc signals. Since there are
libhal_ctx_set_device_added(u->context, device_added_cb);
libhal_ctx_set_device_removed(u->context, device_removed_cb
On Tue, 24.02.09 21:20, Colin Guthrie (gm...@colin.guthr.ie) wrote:
> Hi Lennart,
>
> OK, so attached should be a screenie of the KDE settings window.
>
> As you can see, the idea is to list all the various detected h/w and
> allow them to be prioritised accordingly. The categories are shown on
Hi, Dear developers
I have a question about ALSA plug-in for PA.
ALSA's snd_pcm_prepare will go into ALSA plug-in for PA, and call pulse_prepare
which will first pa_stream_disconnect, and then pa_stream_new.
You know, the pause of audio device of many Media framework will call
snd_pcm_prepare, t
On Tuesday 24 February 2009 21:20:21 Colin Guthrie wrote:
> Hi Lennart,
>
> OK, so attached should be a screenie of the KDE settings window.
>
> As you can see, the idea is to list all the various detected h/w and
> allow them to be prioritised accordingly. The categories are shown on
> the lef
Heya!
http://0pointer.de/public/pulseaudio-0.9.15-test3.tar.gz
We are approaching the final 0.9.15. Threre's probably going to be
another iteration of test release before the final release though,
given that my list of items to fix before the final release is, uh,
oscillating.
Hmm, in contr
Lennart/Colin,
Thanks for the prompt reply. I currently run 9.13, will try 9.14
Conrad
On 2/24/09 11:27 AM, "Lennart Poettering" wrote:
On Tue, 24.02.09 10:59, Conrad Cooke (conrad.co...@palm.com) wrote:
> Pulseaudio people,
>
> I am getting an assertion using gstreamer with pulseaudio.
> U
On Tue, 24.02.09 12:20, Jan Claeys (li...@janc.be) wrote:
>
> Op maandag 23-02-2009 om 15:18 uur [tijdzone -0500], schreef Sean
> McNamara:
> > * Once upon a time (old releases, e.g. 7.04 and below?) there was the
> > -lowlatency kernel flavor. This one went all the way and gave us
> > CONFIG_HZ=
On Tue, 24.02.09 10:59, Conrad Cooke (conrad.co...@palm.com) wrote:
> Pulseaudio people,
>
> I am getting an assertion using gstreamer with pulseaudio.
> Under certain circumstances, pa_sink_input_request_rewind () is asserting
> like this:
> sink-input.c: Assertion 'i->thread_info.rewrite_nbyte
'Twas brillig, and Conrad Cooke at 24/02/09 18:59 did gyre and gimble:
Pulseaudio people,
I am getting an assertion using gstreamer with pulseaudio.
Under certain circumstances, pa_sink_input_request_rewind () is
asserting like this:
sink-input.c: Assertion 'i->thread_info.rewrite_nbytes == 0'
On Tuesday 24 February 2009 13:34:19 Sean McNamara wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 7:20 AM, Jan Claeys wrote:
> > Op maandag 23-02-2009 om 15:18 uur [tijdzone -0500], schreef Sean
> > McNamara:
> >> * Once upon a time (old releases, e.g. 7.04 and below?) there was the
> >> -lowlatency ke
Pulseaudio people,
I am getting an assertion using gstreamer with pulseaudio.
Under certain circumstances, pa_sink_input_request_rewind () is asserting like
this:
sink-input.c: Assertion 'i->thread_info.rewrite_nbytes == 0' failed at
pulsecore/sink-input.c:1212,
My question is: can we remove th
'Twas brillig, and Sjoerd Simons at 24/02/09 14:53 did gyre and gimble:
Debians kernel doesn't have PREEMPT and _HZ_1000, because there is some fear
that this might be bad for performance on server loads (lower throughput
because of more context switches).
Yeah I should note that the results I
On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 10:14:24AM +, Colin Guthrie wrote:
> 'Twas brillig, and Lennart Poettering at 23/02/09 02:05 did gyre and gimble:
>> OpenSUSE apparently does not enable it. The same is true for
>> Ubuntu. Same for Debian. Note sure about Mandriva.
>
> Here is a (not quite current) grep
Hi,
On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 7:20 AM, Jan Claeys wrote:
> Op maandag 23-02-2009 om 15:18 uur [tijdzone -0500], schreef Sean
> McNamara:
>> * Once upon a time (old releases, e.g. 7.04 and below?) there was the
>> -lowlatency kernel flavor. This one went all the way and gave us
>> CONFIG_HZ=1000 and
Op maandag 23-02-2009 om 15:18 uur [tijdzone -0500], schreef Sean
McNamara:
> * Once upon a time (old releases, e.g. 7.04 and below?) there was the
> -lowlatency kernel flavor. This one went all the way and gave us
> CONFIG_HZ=1000 and a fully preemptible kernel (not only voluntary, but
> forced pr
16 matches
Mail list logo
