Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] Dynamic growth of buffer size

2011-01-25 Thread David Henningsson
On 2011-01-25 15:19, Kurt Taylor wrote: Any other thoughts on buffer size growth? Is there a way to increase it during playback that I may have missed? Well, my thought has been to have a huge buffer from the start, just not fill it up entirely after a rewind. -- David Henningsson, Canonical

Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] Dynamic growth of buffer size

2011-01-25 Thread Kurt Taylor
On 24 January 2011 09:21, Kurt Taylor wrote: > > On 20 January 2011 16:45, pl bossart wrote: > >> > Along with increasing the buffer size, the tsched wakeup watermark will >> need >> > to be increased, although my initial prototype code did not do that. I >> > waited until the watermark increase

Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] Build system: Makefile.am patches

2011-01-25 Thread Colin Guthrie
'Twas brillig, and Maarten Bosmans at 25/01/11 11:30 did gyre and gimble: > 2011/1/23 Colin Guthrie : >> 'Twas brillig, and Colin Guthrie at 20/01/11 18:10 did gyre and gimble: >> Yeah the first patch was as I expected. It broke make distcheck. >> >> It also generates all these warnings which are a

Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] Build system: Makefile.am patches

2011-01-25 Thread Maarten Bosmans
2011/1/23 Colin Guthrie : > 'Twas brillig, and Colin Guthrie at 20/01/11 18:10 did gyre and gimble: > Yeah the first patch was as I expected. It broke make distcheck. > > It also generates all these warnings which are a pain... > >  CCLD   libpulsecore-1.0.la >  CC     cli.lo > cc1: warning: ../src

Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] [RFC] Dynamic reconfiguration of sampling rate

2011-01-25 Thread Colin Guthrie
'Twas brillig, and Arun Raghavan at 25/01/11 07:51 did gyre and gimble: > On Mon, 2011-01-24 at 14:14 -0800, pl bossart wrote: >>> FWIW, the zero-length wait seems to work fine for me as well (also >>> HDAudio). A couple of things to consider if we do decide to go ahead >>> with this are are that: