heme to the following.
>
> pa_0.9.22 or pa_1.0
That wouldn't be a problem once tag namespaces are supported:
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/165799
--
Felipe Contreras
___
pulseaudio-discuss mailing list
pulseaudio-discus
On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 3:59 PM, Vincent Legoll wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 12:47 PM, Felipe
> Contreras wrote:
>> In any case, that's not my main point, my main point is: "If somebody
>> wants to have '$version-stable' then I say it should be in a separa
On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 10:20 AM, Colin Guthrie wrote:
> 'Twas brillig, and Felipe Contreras at 25/06/09 01:20 did gyre and gimble:
>>
>> At any given point there's only one *recommended* stable version.
>
> You've obviously not read the previous mails in th
On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 3:08 AM, Colin Guthrie wrote:
> 'Twas brillig, and Felipe Contreras at 25/06/09 00:54 did gyre and gimble:
>>
>> Do you think it's difficult to decide where "stable" should point to?
>> 0.9.15.1 or 0.2.1
>>
>> "sta
On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 11:15 PM, Zygo
Blaxell wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 02:16:03AM +0300, Felipe Contreras wrote:
>> What do you propose instead? Have a "$version-stable" branch for each
>> and every release? That doesn't scale, the repository will be pollute
On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 7:40 PM, Lennart
Poettering wrote:
> On Wed, 10.06.09 02:16, Felipe Contreras (felipe.contre...@gmail.com) wrote:
>
>> I still haven't heard an advantage of "$version-stable" over "stable".
>
> I am with Colin here. It's
On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 1:16 AM, Colin Guthrie wrote:
> 'Twas brillig, and Felipe Contreras at 09/06/09 21:27 did gyre and gimble:
>>
>> See it from the point of view of someone who doesn't know what's the
>> latest version of PA (newbie, or someone who hasn&
On Tue, Jun 9, 2009 at 11:10 PM, Colin Guthrie wrote:
> 'Twas brillig, and Felipe Contreras at 09/06/09 19:03 did gyre and gimble:
>>
>> On Tue, Jun 9, 2009 at 11:08 AM, Colin Guthrie
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Everyone,
>>>
>>> Yesterday
t as I
> tend to manage my patches in git anyway, I figured a git branch would be
> useful :)
>
> So I've pushed the branch "0.9.15-branch" to my own git clone:
> http://colin.guthr.ie/git/pulseaudio/log/?h=0.9.15-br
On Sun, Jun 7, 2009 at 2:16 AM, Lennart
Poettering wrote:
> On Sun, 07.06.09 02:10, Felipe Contreras (felipe.contre...@gmail.com) wrote:
>
>> >> >> #if HAVE_STDBOOL_H
>> >> >> #include
>> >> >> #else
>> >> &g
On Sun, Jun 7, 2009 at 1:03 AM, Lennart
Poettering wrote:
> On Sat, 06.06.09 16:46, Felipe Contreras (felipe.contre...@gmail.com) wrote:
>
>> >> #if HAVE_STDBOOL_H
>> >> #include
>> >> #else
>> >> typedef int bool
>> >> #e
On Sat, Jun 6, 2009 at 4:28 PM, Lennart
Poettering wrote:
> On Sat, 06.06.09 16:05, Felipe Contreras (felipe.contre...@gmail.com) wrote:
>
>> > Internally we actually use a definition like you suggested, but we
>> > don't want to push that into the ABI and hence tri
On Sat, Jun 6, 2009 at 4:26 PM, Lennart
Poettering wrote:
> On Sat, 06.06.09 15:59, Felipe Contreras (felipe.contre...@gmail.com) wrote:
>
>> >> #if HAVE_STDBOOL_H
>> >> #include
>> >> #else
>> >> typedef unsigned char bool
>> >>
On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 3:12 PM, Lennart
Poettering wrote:
> On Mon, 11.05.09 12:56, Felipe Contreras (felipe.contre...@gmail.com) wrote:
>
>>
>> On Sat, May 9, 2009 at 3:14 PM, Lennart Poettering
>> wrote:
>> > On Sat, 09.05.09 12:50, Felipe Contreras (felipe
On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 1:02 PM, Marc-André
Lureau wrote:
> Hi Felipe!
>
> On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 12:56 PM, Felipe Contreras
> wrote:
>> On Sat, May 9, 2009 at 3:14 PM, Lennart Poettering
>> wrote:
>>> On Sat, 09.05.09 12:50, Felipe Contreras (
On Sat, May 9, 2009 at 3:14 PM, Lennart Poettering
wrote:
> On Sat, 09.05.09 12:50, Felipe Contreras (felipe.contre...@gmail.com) wrote:
>
>> > pa_bool_t is used internally only. In the public API we only expose
>> > ints. pa_bool_t is defined as _Bool on C99 and int on ot
gt; compilers. This discrepancy should not be visible to outside due to
> ABI stability issues.
Minor comment; if you include stdbool.h you can use 'bool' which IMHO
is less ugly than _Bool. And I wonder what's the point of pa_bool_t...
if the compiler doesn't have stdbool.h,
non-split.
In the mailing lists I'm subscribed to, I see 2 tendencies: multiple
mailing lists (bugs, user, devel, commits) or one mailing lists with
everything (except commits) including patches. Personally I prefer the
latter.
--
Felipe Contreras
_
workaround the libtool dependency,
but I failed.
> Yes, update libtool first.
I'd rather not. IMO Fedora always keeps up to date with latest
development tools, if something doesn't build on Fedora 10, well, it's
asking not to be tested.
I might try again to workaround the libt
PA in Maemo, maybe he can
give you some tips?
--
Felipe Contreras
___
pulseaudio-discuss mailing list
pulseaudio-discuss@mail.0pointer.de
https://tango.0pointer.de/mailman/listinfo/pulseaudio-discuss
20 matches
Mail list logo
