Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] [RFC] Source Output Volumes

2011-05-22 Thread Arun Raghavan
On Fri, 2011-05-20 at 09:50 +0100, Colin Guthrie wrote: Hello, As some of you know I've been working on restoring a little more symmetry to our API to allow the adjustment of source output (capture stream) volumes. This is really nice to have - thanks! In the past, when stream volumes

[pulseaudio-discuss] [RFC] Source Output Volumes

2011-05-20 Thread Colin Guthrie
Hello, As some of you know I've been working on restoring a little more symmetry to our API to allow the adjustment of source output (capture stream) volumes. In the past, when stream volumes were added to sink inputs, it was thought that this feature wouldn't be overly useful for capture

Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] [RFC] Source Output Volumes

2011-05-20 Thread Maarten Bosmans
2011/5/20 Colin Guthrie gm...@colin.guthr.ie: Hello, As some of you know I've been working on restoring a little more symmetry to our API to allow the adjustment of source output (capture stream) volumes. In the past, when stream volumes were added to sink inputs, it was thought that this

Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] [RFC] Source Output Volumes

2011-05-20 Thread Colin Guthrie
'Twas brillig, and Maarten Bosmans at 20/05/11 10:23 did gyre and gimble: With flat volumes, adding per-stream volumes to capture streams makes sense. With these changes, would it still be possible to record audio without software gain? As it is now, I can record from a source that has its

Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] [RFC] Source Output Volumes

2011-05-20 Thread Maarten Bosmans
2011/5/20 Colin Guthrie gm...@colin.guthr.ie: 'Twas brillig, and Maarten Bosmans at 20/05/11 10:23 did gyre and gimble: With flat volumes, adding per-stream volumes to capture streams makes sense. With these changes, would it still be possible to record audio without software gain? As it