On Mon, 19.04.10 19:23, Jan Braun (janbr...@gmx.de) wrote:
1;2400;0c Lennart Poettering schrob:
...and you're explicitly disallowing cross-user shm transfer. :(
I guess I'll have to figure out the security implications of messing
with that.
Well, the story goes like this: we need to
Lennart Poettering schrob:
On Fri, 16.04.10 21:02, Jan Braun (janbr...@gmx.de) wrote:
You see, currently I'm the only person with access to my desktop pc,
but I have several user accounts on it[1]. And I use them all.
Simultaneously. As in: several consoles open, often more than 1 xserver
Lennart Poettering schrob:
On Sat, 17.04.10 16:42, Jan Braun (janbr...@gmx.de) wrote:
Hmm, why not? I've set up PA as you describe (except for the additional
auth-group parameter), and PA is creating entries in /dev/shm , even for
other users than albert.
The PA client libs always
Lennart Poettering schrob:
...and you're explicitly disallowing cross-user shm transfer. :(
I guess I'll have to figure out the security implications of messing
with that.
Well, the story goes like this: we need to make sure that a user A
cannot trigger a SIGBUS in processes by user B
On 19 Apr 2010, Lennart Poettering outgrape:
On Fri, 16.04.10 21:02, Jan Braun (janbr...@gmx.de) wrote:
xterms ssh'd to otheru...@localhost .
Why would you ssh to the local machine?
'cos it forwards your X cookie and authentication agent connection for
you. (Of course you can do the X cookie
On Fri, 16.04.10 21:02, Jan Braun (janbr...@gmx.de) wrote:
Hi list,
and sorry for bringing up this topic again, but I'm another user who
has difficulties with PA's multi-user policy.
You see, currently I'm the only person with access to my desktop pc,
but I have several user accounts on
On Sat, 17.04.10 16:42, Jan Braun (janbr...@gmx.de) wrote:
My suggestion is basically the same as your option 3, without the double
mixing and tcp overhead (I'm not sure whether using the loopback
interface has much more overhead than unix domain sockets, though - you
still won't be able
On Sat, 17.04.10 18:28, Tanu Kaskinen (ta...@iki.fi) wrote:
On Sat, 2010-04-17 at 16:42 +0200, Jan Braun wrote:
Hmm, why not? I've set up PA as you describe (except for the additional
auth-group parameter), and PA is creating entries in /dev/shm , even for
other users than albert.
Oh,
On Fri, 2010-04-16 at 21:02 +0200, Jan Braun wrote:
Hi list,
and sorry for bringing up this topic again, but I'm another user who
has difficulties with PA's multi-user policy.
You see, currently I'm the only person with access to my desktop pc,
but I have several user accounts on it[1]. And
[I accidentally sent this only to Marti, you're getting it twice, sorry]
Marti Raudsepp schrob:
Can't you just copy ~/.pulse-cookie to all users' profiles, so
everyone can access anyone else's PA daemon? It works for me, but I'm
just using different user accounts within one X session.
Oops,
Tanu Kaskinen schrob:
On Fri, 2010-04-16 at 21:02 +0200, Jan Braun wrote:
*** Now is your chance to say that's insane, and we don't support it
I can't say it's insane, otherwise I'd be admitting that I've been
insane in the past :)
Well, you could say you've seen the error of your ways. ;)
On Sat, 2010-04-17 at 16:42 +0200, Jan Braun wrote:
Hmm, why not? I've set up PA as you describe (except for the additional
auth-group parameter), and PA is creating entries in /dev/shm , even for
other users than albert.
Oh, maybe shm does work? I assumed that the logic was that only
'Twas brillig, and Tanu Kaskinen at 17/04/10 16:28 did gyre and gimble:
On Sat, 2010-04-17 at 16:42 +0200, Jan Braun wrote:
Hmm, why not? I've set up PA as you describe (except for the additional
auth-group parameter), and PA is creating entries in /dev/shm , even for
other users than albert.
Hi list,
and sorry for bringing up this topic again, but I'm another user who
has difficulties with PA's multi-user policy.
You see, currently I'm the only person with access to my desktop pc,
but I have several user accounts on it[1]. And I use them all.
Simultaneously. As in: several consoles
On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 10:02 PM, Jan Braun janbr...@gmx.de wrote:
You see, currently I'm the only person with access to my desktop pc,
but I have several user accounts on it[1]. And I use them all.
Simultaneously. As in: several consoles open, often more than 1 xserver
running, xterms ssh'd
15 matches
Mail list logo
