Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] Unable to compile for some values of CHOST (on x86_64)

2009-10-02 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Wed, 30.09.09 19:36, Nix (n...@esperi.org.uk) wrote: On 30 Sep 2009, Lennart Poettering said: No, --as-needed is a klduge. We explicitly don't support that because there is a cyclic dep between libpulse and libpulsecommon. Try to google or grep the archives for an explanation for

Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] Unable to compile for some values of CHOST (on x86_64)

2009-09-30 Thread Ng Oon-Ee
I guess I'll ignore the LDFLAGS stuff, just brought it up because when I questioned the Arch devs about the new LDFLAGS they mentioned that these were added because most current software should have no problems with the flags used. And now that I look at it, the -Wl is just part of

Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] Unable to compile for some values of CHOST (on x86_64)

2009-09-30 Thread Ng Oon-Ee
On Wed, 2009-09-30 at 15:54 +0800, Ng Oon-Ee wrote: Sorry, I was just wondering whether its a known issue. When I try to compile with CHOST=x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, I get errors about undefined reference to `lt__PROGRAM__LTX_preloaded_symbols` in various functions. If you wish the exact error

Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] Unable to compile for some values of CHOST (on x86_64)

2009-09-30 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Wed, 30.09.09 15:54, Ng Oon-Ee (ngoo...@gmail.com) wrote: On Wed, 2009-09-30 at 09:31 +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote: On Wed, 30.09.09 15:22, Ng Oon-Ee (ngoo...@gmail.com) wrote: I'm using Archlinux 64-bit (x86_64), and am having trouble compiling pulseaudio from git (or even

Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] Unable to compile for some values of CHOST (on x86_64)

2009-09-30 Thread Ng Oon-Ee
On Wed, 2009-09-30 at 17:50 +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote: On Wed, 30.09.09 16:08, Ng Oon-Ee (ngoo...@gmail.com) wrote: On Wed, 2009-09-30 at 15:54 +0800, Ng Oon-Ee wrote: Sorry, I was just wondering whether its a known issue. When I try to compile with CHOST=x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, I