2011/3/2 Andriy Gapon <a...@freebsd.org>: > on 02/03/2011 17:18 Michal Varga said the following: >> On Wed, 2011-03-02 at 16:13 +0100, Michal Varga wrote: >>> So instead of fixing things like these in ports, I'd say the issue >>> should be reported/fix submitted to upstream, it's pretty much possible >>> that they don't even know that there are systems that don't run evdev >>> (note that I don't mean it offensively, more like speaking generally >>> from experience, it simply happens). >>> >> >> Eh, I meant udev of course, I guess that's enough coffee for me today. > > That's possible, of course. Another possibility is that they think that > everything is Linux, or everything is like Linux, or they don't care about > not Linux.
Development of pulseaudio is certainly a bit of a linux-focused affair. But we very much want other platforms to be included as well, as can be seen by the OSX, *BSD, Solaris and win32 support currently in the tree. > I am all for contacting them, for sure. > Just want to point out that the proposed patch would not be against the > nature of > the ports, because it doesn't affect functionality, but addresses OS > differences. There is already some FreeBSD specific code in PulseAudio upstream. Especially considering some changes required to make pulse run on freebsd and netbsd are quite similar, I think it makes sense to submit your patches. > -- > Andriy Gapon Maarten _______________________________________________ pulseaudio-discuss mailing list pulseaudio-discuss@mail.0pointer.de https://tango.0pointer.de/mailman/listinfo/pulseaudio-discuss
