Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] No Use for JACK Transport

2007-07-30 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Wed, 25.07.07 13:39, Tanu Kaskinen ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > That is totally unnecessary, except that the modules seem to > use the JACK transport API to calculate the latency > accurately. In my patched JACK sink (see #91) the latency is > a multiple of the processing block size and pretty

Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] No Use for JACK Transport

2007-07-25 Thread Tanu Kaskinen
On Wed, Jul 25, 2007 at 02:46:38AM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote: > On Fri, 13.07.07 03:22, Esben Stien ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > > > There is no use for JACK transport in pulseaudio. As it is now, > > pulseaudio won't output JACK audio when the transport is off. This is > > wrong. > > I am

Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] No Use for JACK Transport

2007-07-24 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Fri, 13.07.07 03:22, Esben Stien ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > There is no use for JACK transport in pulseaudio. As it is now, > pulseaudio won't output JACK audio when the transport is off. This is > wrong. I am sorry? I don't understand? Lennart -- Lennart Poettering