On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 10:27 AM, Colin Guthriegm...@colin.guthr.ie wrote:
Hi,
Just doing the usual round of testing :)
Three things:
1) So far I've got two people reporting that the latest batch of updates
have caused CPU usage problems and choppy (or no audio) so I think there is
a bit
In my never ending quest to find out just wtf is wrong with tsched/alsa
and my equalizer I now set my private sink's max_request to the max of
the original and what I know I need in terms of the minimum granularity
of filtering. It turns out that the original max_request though seems
to be always
'Twas brillig, and Valent Turkovic at 31/08/09 10:13 did gyre and gimble:
On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 10:27 AM, Colin Guthriegm...@colin.guthr.ie wrote:
Hi,
Just doing the usual round of testing :)
Three things:
1) So far I've got two people reporting that the latest batch of updates
have caused
'Twas brillig, and Colin Guthrie at 31/08/09 12:12 did gyre and gimble:
'Twas brillig, and Lennart Poettering at 28/08/09 15:39 did gyre and
gimble:
3) I'm also seeing quite regularly a deadlock in pulse. This one is
quite serious as it obviously freezes the display of most
libcanberra apps
On Mon, 31.08.09 12:12, Colin Guthrie (gm...@colin.guthr.ie) wrote:
The IO threads are hanging in ppoll(), and are hence not
deadlocked. The main thread hangs in mlock(). Which is a fucntion that
locks memory into RAM. We use it as a dirty hack for making sure
cached samples are swapped back
On Mon, 31.08.09 17:00, Colin Guthrie (gm...@colin.guthr.ie) wrote:
4 Thread 0x7f706a86b910 (LWP 9012) 0x7f706ab51a47 in ppoll
() from /lib64/libc.so.6
3 Thread 0x7f70648f4910 (LWP 9016) 0x7f706ab51a47 in ppoll
() from /lib64/libc.so.6
2 Thread 0x7f70640f3910 (LWP 9149)
On Sun, 30.08.09 16:36, Jim Duda (j...@duda.tzo.com) wrote:
I'm trying to upgrade to FC11, which comes with pulseaudio 0.15 release.
My environment is a little odd. I have a bunch of headless machines
which share a diskless root file system mounted over NFS. Each machine
has it's own
On Sun, 30.08.09 17:31, Colin Guthrie (gm...@colin.guthr.ie) wrote:
Heya!
Do you have any objection to making these priorities user adjustable via
the protocol in some way? I know you intend this to be more or less
automatic for general out of the box use, but as we've discussed before,
On Sun, 30.08.09 03:21, Jason A. Donenfeld (ja...@zx2c4.com) wrote:
Hello,
I'm wondering the status of PA on OSX. The latest SSE commits cause the
compile to fail, but checking out a revision before those compiles fine.
Unfortunately, it segfaults when running. What's the timeline for OSX
- Lennart Poettering lenn...@poettering.net wrote:
On Sat, 29.08.09 17:40, Nasa (nas...@comcast.net) wrote:
Maybe I didn't quite explain it right... If I login into a terminal
and
do a pulseaudio --start, then a mplayer *mp3 I will get the song
playing..
If I then do a startx and
10 matches
Mail list logo
