2009/5/27 Patrick Shirkey pshir...@boosthardware.com:
Do you or anyone else have a specific reasoning for using only the jackdbus
version? Is is just because the person who wrote the code wrote it to work
with jackdbus?
Is this something that could be handled in a different way to give
Tanu Kaskinen wrote:
2009/5/27 Patrick Shirkey pshir...@boosthardware.com:
Do you or anyone else have a specific reasoning for using only the jackdbus
version? Is is just because the person who wrote the code wrote it to work
with jackdbus?
Is this something that could be handled in a
2009/5/27 Patrick Shirkey pshir...@boosthardware.com:
So is the only way to communicate with pulse other than brute force kill or
pasuspender to use the dbus protocol?
Probably yes, since it seems that PA's client API doesn't contain
functions for suspending sinks (i.e. release devices). But
On Wed, 2009-05-27 at 10:12 +0300, Tanu Kaskinen wrote:
2009/5/27 Patrick Shirkey pshir...@boosthardware.com:
So is the only way to communicate with pulse other than brute force kill or
pasuspender to use the dbus protocol?
Probably yes, since it seems that PA's client API doesn't contain
Tanu Kaskinen wrote:
2009/5/27 Patrick Shirkey pshir...@boosthardware.com:
So is the only way to communicate with pulse other than brute force kill or
pasuspender to use the dbus protocol?
Probably yes, since it seems that PA's client API doesn't contain
functions for suspending
Hi,
Anyone know what could be causing this error with latest git and fedora
10 x64, gcc (GCC) 4.3.2 20081105 (Red Hat 4.3.2-7) ?
checking if gcc -std=gnu99 supports -Wl,-version-script=./src/map-file
flag... yes
checking target operating system... linux
checking whether gcc -std=gnu99
2009/5/27 Patrick Shirkey pshir...@boosthardware.com:
Anyone know what could be causing this error with latest git and fedora 10
x64, gcc (GCC) 4.3.2 20081105 (Red Hat 4.3.2-7) ?
snip
/usr/local/src/pulseaudio/pulseaudio/configure: line 5866: syntax error near
unexpected token `2.2'
'Twas brillig, and Jud Craft at 27/05/09 04:06 did gyre and gimble:
Actually, wait. There is one last thing that might clue me in.
Let's say I have, relative to each other, Firefox/youTube set to 100%
and Banshee set to 80%.
Now, imagine I'm listening to Banshee and my volume is 100%. Does
Colin Guthrie wrote:
'Twas brillig, and Patrick Shirkey at 27/05/09 04:56 did gyre and gimble:
'pavucontroller' what do you mean?
The pulse audio volume controller is called pavucontroller in
fedora 10 packages.
I doubt that very much. You are referring to pavucontrol. (note: no
ler
Colin Guthrie a écrit :
Essentially, whenever possible pulse is off-loading the scaling to the
h/w, meaning less work in software = less load, and better quality audio
due to the use of the full range of the DAC.
Slightly off-topic: is there a way to keep the flat-volume behavior but
with
On Wed, 27.05.09 19:00, Patrick Shirkey (pshir...@boosthardware.com) wrote:
Adding to my confusion, Why is the pavucontrol the same icon as the
vucontrol applet in Fedora10?
Because that's the generic volume control icon. It's the one whose
name is defined in the icon naming spec.
On Wed, 27.05.09 14:00, Patrick Shirkey (pshir...@boosthardware.com) wrote:
So is the only way to communicate with pulse other than brute force kill
or pasuspender to use the dbus protocol?
You can:
1. Kill PA
2. Unload only the ALSA modules that access the underlying audio
device with
On Wed, 27.05.09 14:28, Patrick Shirkey (pshir...@boosthardware.com) wrote:
Well in recent discussions over at jack-devel it turns out that a lot of
people don't want dbus support in any way, shape or form so I would like
to explore the alternatives to have a complete overview of the
On Wed, 27.05.09 11:07, Colin Guthrie (gm...@colin.guthr.ie) wrote:
In essence...applying my per-app ratios automatically on the fly,
whenever something comes up? I'll be honest, I didn't really think of
it like -that-. That sounds awesome enough that I might need to give
it another chance.
On Wed, 27.05.09 14:28, Rémi Cardona (r...@gentoo.org) wrote:
Colin Guthrie a écrit :
Essentially, whenever possible pulse is off-loading the scaling to the
h/w, meaning less work in software = less load, and better quality
audio due to the use of the full range of the DAC.
Slightly
pavucontrol is not installed by default anymore on F11.
Lennart
Out of curiosity, why not? I'm an Archer myself, but not installing
pavucontrol doesn't seem sensible to me.
___
pulseaudio-discuss mailing list
pulseaudio-discuss@mail.0pointer.de
On Wed, 27.05.09 09:13, Jud Craft (craft...@gmail.com) wrote:
On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 5:07 AM, Colin Guthrie gm...@colin.guthr.ie wrote:
The way I understand it, and apologies if I'm wrong here, is that Banshess
want's 80% and it's the only app playing. In order to achieve that result,
Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Wed, 27.05.09 14:28, Patrick Shirkey (pshir...@boosthardware.com) wrote:
Well in recent discussions over at jack-devel it turns out that a lot of
people don't want dbus support in any way, shape or form so I would like
to explore the alternatives to have a
Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Wed, 27.05.09 23:19, Ng Oon-Ee (ngoo...@gmail.com) wrote:
pavucontrol is not installed by default anymore on F11.
Lennart
Out of curiosity, why not? I'm an Archer myself, but not installing
pavucontrol doesn't seem sensible to me.
Because The
Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Wed, 27.05.09 10:12, Tanu Kaskinen (ta...@iki.fi) wrote:
2009/5/27 Patrick Shirkey pshir...@boosthardware.com:
So is the only way to communicate with pulse other than brute force kill or
pasuspender to use the dbus protocol?
Probably yes, since it
On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 10:23 AM, Lennart Poettering
lenn...@poettering.net wrote:
Mate, please just read those mails I wrote yesterday.
I'm working on it, I think I'm getting better. Note the end of this email...
PA is not storing stream volumes relative to each other but relative
to the
On Wed, 2009-05-27 at 01:10 +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
Could you please to the following:
1) Add a system load monitor applet to your panel, so that you can monitor if
your CPU is idle or not.
2) Terminate PA in a terminal:
$ pulseaudio -k
3) In the same terminal start PA with
On Thu, 28.05.09 00:54, Patrick Shirkey (pshir...@boosthardware.com) wrote:
So does that essentially mean that gnome-vu-control and pavucontrol from
Fedora 10 have been integrated into one in Fedora 11?
Kind of:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/VolumeControl
Lennart
--
Lennart
On Thu, 28.05.09 00:58, Patrick Shirkey (pshir...@boosthardware.com) wrote:
Just to confirm, would it be trivial to have ex. pajackconnect which
could be called when jack is started which suspended the existing
sink/source and unloaded them and inserted module-jack-sink and
On Thu, 28.05.09 00:52, Patrick Shirkey (pshir...@boosthardware.com) wrote:
D-Bus is available under AFL and GPL2. AFL should be fine for LGPL
uses and GPL2 should be fine for GPL uses. Even companies like Nokia
who run closed source software on Linux are fine with D-Bus.
After the past
On Wed, 27.05.09 13:28, Jud Craft (craft...@gmail.com) wrote:
On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 10:23 AM, Lennart Poettering
lenn...@poettering.net wrote:
Mate, please just read those mails I wrote yesterday.
I'm working on it, I think I'm getting better. Note the end of this email...
PA is
On Wed, 27.05.09 14:33, Brian J. Murrell (br...@interlinx.bc.ca) wrote:
On Wed, 2009-05-27 at 01:10 +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
Could you please to the following:
1) Add a system load monitor applet to your panel, so that you can monitor
if
your CPU is idle or not.
2)
On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 2:27 PM, Lennart Poettering
lenn...@poettering.net wrote:
Side-effect of the logic? The fact that all volumes are saved/restored
relatively to the reference volume is the very core of the logic.
No, no, I didn't mean to say the side effect wasn't that the volumes
were
On Wed, 27.05.09 15:51, Brian J. Murrell (br...@interlinx.bc.ca) wrote:
Hmm, so you seem to be using the tunnel stuff a lot.
If you mean making the server available to the network, yeah. Just for
the ease of moving a stream from one machine to another.
I am pretty sure
this is
On Wednesday 27 May 2009 20:24:46 Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Thu, 28.05.09 00:52, Patrick Shirkey (pshir...@boosthardware.com) wrote:
D-Bus is available under AFL and GPL2. AFL should be fine for LGPL
uses and GPL2 should be fine for GPL uses. Even companies like Nokia
who run closed
On 05/28/2009 04:36 AM, Mark Greenwood wrote:
On Wednesday 27 May 2009 20:24:46 Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Thu, 28.05.09 00:52, Patrick Shirkey (pshir...@boosthardware.com) wrote:
D-Bus is available under AFL and GPL2. AFL should be fine for LGPL
uses and GPL2 should be fine for
On Thu, 28.05.09 04:53, Patrick Shirkey (pshir...@boosthardware.com) wrote:
I think it is useful that you have the internal api calls so dbus is not
a requirement for communicating with PA.
I am sorry to inform you that eventually PA will use D-Bus for client
communication too. Already now
On Thu, 28.05.09 00:11, CJ van den Berg (c...@vdbonline.com) wrote:
On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 12:47:28AM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
Volume control UIs show the sink's virtual volume in the sink
slider. You can change the reference volume by changing the sink slider
position. In which
On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 12:31:29AM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
I still think that my suggestion to drop the virtual volume altogether
in the UI and have the sink volume slider display the reference volume
is the right solution.
I am not convinced. Think about this scenario: you have
On Wednesday 27 May 2009 23:31:29 Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Thu, 28.05.09 00:11, CJ van den Berg (c...@vdbonline.com) wrote:
On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 12:47:28AM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
Volume control UIs show the sink's virtual volume in the sink
slider. You can change the
On Thu, 28.05.09 00:53, CJ van den Berg (c...@vdbonline.com) wrote:
I am not convinced. Think about this scenario: you have one stream
playing. Reference sink volume, virtual sink volume and stream volume
are at -inf dB. Now you move stream volume to 0 dB. This would not
change the
On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 01:33:48AM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Thu, 28.05.09 00:53, CJ van den Berg (c...@vdbonline.com) wrote:
I am not convinced. Think about this scenario: you have one stream
playing. Reference sink volume, virtual sink volume and stream volume
are at -inf
On Thu, 28.05.09 01:47, CJ van den Berg (c...@vdbonline.com) wrote:
On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 01:33:48AM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Thu, 28.05.09 00:53, CJ van den Berg (c...@vdbonline.com) wrote:
I am not convinced. Think about this scenario: you have one stream
playing.
On 05/28/2009 05:15 AM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Thu, 28.05.09 04:53, Patrick Shirkey (pshir...@boosthardware.com) wrote:
I think it is useful that you have the internal api calls so dbus is not
a requirement for communicating with PA.
I am sorry to inform you that eventually
39 matches
Mail list logo