'Twas brillig, and Kurt Taylor at 24/03/11 23:21 did gyre and gimble:
> Hi all, I was wondering what happed with the LAC meetup. Were any plans
> firmed up to have a pulseaudio working session before/after LAC?
Nothing formal arranged as of yet, but I'll be going, open to timing
suggestions.
Col
Hi all, I was wondering what happed with the LAC meetup. Were any plans
firmed up to have a pulseaudio working session before/after LAC?
Kurt Taylor (irc krtaylor)
On 19 February 2011 00:40, Arun Raghavan wrote:
> On Fri, 2011-02-18 at 23:00 +0200, Tanu Kaskinen wrote:
> > On Fri, 2011-02-18 at
On Fri, 2011-02-18 at 23:00 +0200, Tanu Kaskinen wrote:
> On Fri, 2011-02-18 at 11:15 -0600, Kurt Taylor wrote:
> > Thanks for organizing this Colin! I will do my best to attend, but that is
> > 5am (UTC-6) for me.
>
> It sounds like a few hours later would be better than the suggested
> 11:00 UT
On Fri, 2011-02-18 at 11:15 -0600, Kurt Taylor wrote:
> Thanks for organizing this Colin! I will do my best to attend, but that is
> 5am (UTC-6) for me.
It sounds like a few hours later would be better than the suggested
11:00 UTC. Arun would probably be the first person to be annoyed by the
time
Thanks for organizing this Colin! I will do my best to attend, but that is
5am (UTC-6) for me.
Regards,
Kurt Taylor (irc krtaylor)
On 18 February 2011 11:03, Scott Reeves wrote:
> >>> On 2/16/2011 at 04:54 PM, Colin Guthrie wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > There have been a few discussions recently
>>> On 2/16/2011 at 04:54 PM, Colin Guthrie wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> There have been a few discussions recently about getting a solid roadmap
> organised for the next medium term of PA development. While the
> stable-queue stuff has been bubbling along nicely enough, there are
> several new features
On 2011-02-17 00:54, Colin Guthrie wrote:
Hi all,
There have been a few discussions recently about getting a solid roadmap
organised for the next medium term of PA development. While the
stable-queue stuff has been bubbling along nicely enough, there are
several new features in the 1.x master br
2011/2/17 Colin Guthrie :
> There have been a few discussions recently about getting a solid roadmap
> organised for the next medium term of PA development. While the
> stable-queue stuff has been bubbling along nicely enough, there are
> several new features in the 1.x master branch but no real ti
Hi all,
There have been a few discussions recently about getting a solid roadmap
organised for the next medium term of PA development. While the
stable-queue stuff has been bubbling along nicely enough, there are
several new features in the 1.x master branch but no real timescales
decided. There a
