Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] pulsesrc consumes much more CPU than alsasrc

2010-03-25 Thread Bin Gao
Oh, I tested that on an Atom platform. Is that the cause? -Bin On Mon, 2010-03-15 at 05:12 -0600, Colin Guthrie wrote: Hi Bin, 'Twas brillig, and Bin Gao at 15/03/10 10:28 did gyre and gimble: (resend as plain text) Nice :) It seems both pulseaudio alsa PCM plugin (source) and

[pulseaudio-discuss] pulsesrc consumes much more CPU than alsasrc

2010-03-15 Thread Bin Gao
Hi all, It seems both pulseaudio alsa PCM plugin (source) and gstreamer pulsesrc consume much more CPU resource than alsa when working on the same sample (rate, channel and format). I had a rough look at the source code and found they both use the threaded mainloop model. Can we have any chance

[pulseaudio-discuss] pulsesrc consumes much more CPU than alsasrc

2010-03-15 Thread Bin Gao
(resend as plain text) Hi all, It seems both pulseaudio alsa PCM plugin (source) and gstreamer pulsesrc consume much more CPU resource than alsa when working on the same sample (rate, channel and format). I had a rough look at the source code and found they both use the threaded mainloop model.

Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] pulsesrc consumes much more CPU than alsasrc

2010-03-15 Thread Colin Guthrie
Hi Bin, 'Twas brillig, and Bin Gao at 15/03/10 10:28 did gyre and gimble: (resend as plain text) Nice :) It seems both pulseaudio alsa PCM plugin (source) and gstreamer pulsesrc consume much more CPU resource than alsa when working on the same sample (rate, channel and format). I had a