Hello,
2010/5/7 David Henningsson launchpad@epost.diwic.se:
On 2010-04-25 22:11, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Sun, 25.04.10 21:41, David Henningsson (launchpad@epost.diwic.se)
wrote:
which handle corresponds to the thread, or even if that handle is local
or not. Wineserver
On Sat, 08.05.10 11:21, Maarten Lankhorst (m.b.lankho...@gmail.com) wrote:
So let my rephrase my question to Maarten: Since there is no equivalent
to RLIMIT_RTTIME in Windows, applications might assume they can run in
RT for extended periods of time. This might be considered bad
On Wed, 05.05.10 01:10, Maarten Lankhorst (m.b.lankho...@gmail.com) wrote:
Patch looks goot to me. But could you fix one thing: I think
MakeThreadRealtimeWithPID() (or something like tht) would be a better
name than MakeThreadRealtime2(). After examples like wait(), wait3() and
wait4() in
On 2010-04-25 22:11, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Sun, 25.04.10 21:41, David Henningsson (launchpad@epost.diwic.se)
wrote:
which handle corresponds to the thread, or even if that handle is local
or not. Wineserver controls this information so all requests that
involve handles involve
Hello,
On 25-04-10 02:52, Lennart Poettering wrote:
...snip
OK, I am convinced. ;-)
And yes, your use of rktit certainly makes a lot of sense.
Patch looks goot to me. But could you fix one thing: I think
MakeThreadRealtimeWithPID() (or something like tht) would be a better
name than
Maarten Lankhorst wrote:
Well, the use case would be wine's wineserver. On windows programs
usually set audio threads to THREAD_PRIORITY_TIME_CRITICAL to indicate
that they have to have a certain priority. But in windows thread handles
are global, so doing it inside wine's 'ntdll' library
On Sun, 25.04.10 21:41, David Henningsson (launchpad@epost.diwic.se) wrote:
which handle corresponds to the thread, or even if that handle is local
or not. Wineserver controls this information so all requests that
involve handles involve a wineserver call, in general. So racing cannot
I'm not sure if I have the right mailing list, since there doesn't
appear to be a a mailing list for rtkit.
This is a patch that would allow you to set the realtime priority for
another process then the one calling rtkit over dbus. This can be useful
for a 'setsched' like utility, or for
Hello Lennart,
On 25-04-10 01:42, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Sat, 24.04.10 01:18, Maarten Lankhorst (m.b.lankho...@gmail.com) wrote:
I'm not sure if I have the right mailing list, since there doesn't
appear to be a a mailing list for rtkit.
This is a patch that would allow you to set
On Sun, 25.04.10 02:30, Maarten Lankhorst (m.b.lankho...@gmail.com) wrote:
What concerns me a bit here is that RT programs must be written in an
RT specific style to make sense. That means they must internally know
which threads to make RT and which ones not, and when. From the
outside of the
10 matches
Mail list logo
