Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] [PATCH] echo-cancel: Try to minimise in-flight chunks in snapshot latency

2017-03-28 Thread Arun Raghavan
On Wed, 29 Mar 2017, at 12:35 AM, Georg Chini wrote: > On 28.03.2017 12:02, Arun Raghavan wrote: > > > > On Mon, 27 Mar 2017, at 01:57 AM, Georg Chini wrote: > >> On 20.03.2017 08:25, Arun Raghavan wrote: > >>> On Thu, 9 Mar 2017, at 09:53 PM, Georg Chini wrote: > On 09.03.2017 17:14, Georg

Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] [PATCH] echo-cancel: Try to minimise in-flight chunks in snapshot latency

2017-03-28 Thread Georg Chini
On 28.03.2017 12:02, Arun Raghavan wrote: On Mon, 27 Mar 2017, at 01:57 AM, Georg Chini wrote: On 20.03.2017 08:25, Arun Raghavan wrote: On Thu, 9 Mar 2017, at 09:53 PM, Georg Chini wrote: On 09.03.2017 17:14, Georg Chini wrote: On 09.03.2017 16:33, Arun Raghavan wrote: On Thu, 9 Mar 2017,

Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] [PATCH] echo-cancel: Try to minimise in-flight chunks in snapshot latency

2017-03-28 Thread Arun Raghavan
On Mon, 27 Mar 2017, at 01:57 AM, Georg Chini wrote: > On 20.03.2017 08:25, Arun Raghavan wrote: > > > > On Thu, 9 Mar 2017, at 09:53 PM, Georg Chini wrote: > >> On 09.03.2017 17:14, Georg Chini wrote: > >>> On 09.03.2017 16:33, Arun Raghavan wrote: > On Thu, 9 Mar 2017, at 03:27 PM, Georg C

Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] [PATCH] echo-cancel: Try to minimise in-flight chunks in snapshot latency

2017-03-26 Thread Georg Chini
On 20.03.2017 08:25, Arun Raghavan wrote: On Thu, 9 Mar 2017, at 09:53 PM, Georg Chini wrote: On 09.03.2017 17:14, Georg Chini wrote: On 09.03.2017 16:33, Arun Raghavan wrote: On Thu, 9 Mar 2017, at 03:27 PM, Georg Chini wrote: On 09.03.2017 05:37, Arun Raghavan wrote: We don't always know

Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] [PATCH] echo-cancel: Try to minimise in-flight chunks in snapshot latency

2017-03-20 Thread Arun Raghavan
On Thu, 9 Mar 2017, at 09:53 PM, Georg Chini wrote: > On 09.03.2017 17:14, Georg Chini wrote: > > On 09.03.2017 16:33, Arun Raghavan wrote: > >> > >> On Thu, 9 Mar 2017, at 03:27 PM, Georg Chini wrote: > >>> On 09.03.2017 05:37, Arun Raghavan wrote: > We don't always know whether the in-flig

Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] [PATCH] echo-cancel: Try to minimise in-flight chunks in snapshot latency

2017-03-09 Thread Georg Chini
On 09.03.2017 17:14, Georg Chini wrote: On 09.03.2017 16:33, Arun Raghavan wrote: On Thu, 9 Mar 2017, at 03:27 PM, Georg Chini wrote: On 09.03.2017 05:37, Arun Raghavan wrote: We don't always know whether the in-flight memory chunks will be rendered or skipped (if the source is not in RUNNING

Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] [PATCH] echo-cancel: Try to minimise in-flight chunks in snapshot latency

2017-03-09 Thread Georg Chini
On 09.03.2017 16:33, Arun Raghavan wrote: On Thu, 9 Mar 2017, at 03:27 PM, Georg Chini wrote: On 09.03.2017 05:37, Arun Raghavan wrote: We don't always know whether the in-flight memory chunks will be rendered or skipped (if the source is not in RUNNING). This can cause us to have an erroneous

Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] [PATCH] echo-cancel: Try to minimise in-flight chunks in snapshot latency

2017-03-09 Thread Arun Raghavan
On Thu, 9 Mar 2017, at 03:27 PM, Georg Chini wrote: > On 09.03.2017 05:37, Arun Raghavan wrote: > > We don't always know whether the in-flight memory chunks will be > > rendered or skipped (if the source is not in RUNNING). This can cause us > > to have an erroneous estimate of drift, particularl

Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] [PATCH] echo-cancel: Try to minimise in-flight chunks in snapshot latency

2017-03-09 Thread Georg Chini
On 09.03.2017 05:37, Arun Raghavan wrote: We don't always know whether the in-flight memory chunks will be rendered or skipped (if the source is not in RUNNING). This can cause us to have an erroneous estimate of drift, particularly when the canceller starts. To avoid this, we explicitly flush o