On Wed, 29 Mar 2017, at 12:35 AM, Georg Chini wrote:
> On 28.03.2017 12:02, Arun Raghavan wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, 27 Mar 2017, at 01:57 AM, Georg Chini wrote:
> >> On 20.03.2017 08:25, Arun Raghavan wrote:
> >>> On Thu, 9 Mar 2017, at 09:53 PM, Georg Chini wrote:
> On 09.03.2017 17:14, Georg
On 28.03.2017 12:02, Arun Raghavan wrote:
On Mon, 27 Mar 2017, at 01:57 AM, Georg Chini wrote:
On 20.03.2017 08:25, Arun Raghavan wrote:
On Thu, 9 Mar 2017, at 09:53 PM, Georg Chini wrote:
On 09.03.2017 17:14, Georg Chini wrote:
On 09.03.2017 16:33, Arun Raghavan wrote:
On Thu, 9 Mar 2017,
On Mon, 27 Mar 2017, at 01:57 AM, Georg Chini wrote:
> On 20.03.2017 08:25, Arun Raghavan wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, 9 Mar 2017, at 09:53 PM, Georg Chini wrote:
> >> On 09.03.2017 17:14, Georg Chini wrote:
> >>> On 09.03.2017 16:33, Arun Raghavan wrote:
> On Thu, 9 Mar 2017, at 03:27 PM, Georg C
On 20.03.2017 08:25, Arun Raghavan wrote:
On Thu, 9 Mar 2017, at 09:53 PM, Georg Chini wrote:
On 09.03.2017 17:14, Georg Chini wrote:
On 09.03.2017 16:33, Arun Raghavan wrote:
On Thu, 9 Mar 2017, at 03:27 PM, Georg Chini wrote:
On 09.03.2017 05:37, Arun Raghavan wrote:
We don't always know
On Thu, 9 Mar 2017, at 09:53 PM, Georg Chini wrote:
> On 09.03.2017 17:14, Georg Chini wrote:
> > On 09.03.2017 16:33, Arun Raghavan wrote:
> >>
> >> On Thu, 9 Mar 2017, at 03:27 PM, Georg Chini wrote:
> >>> On 09.03.2017 05:37, Arun Raghavan wrote:
> We don't always know whether the in-flig
On 09.03.2017 17:14, Georg Chini wrote:
On 09.03.2017 16:33, Arun Raghavan wrote:
On Thu, 9 Mar 2017, at 03:27 PM, Georg Chini wrote:
On 09.03.2017 05:37, Arun Raghavan wrote:
We don't always know whether the in-flight memory chunks will be
rendered or skipped (if the source is not in RUNNING
On 09.03.2017 16:33, Arun Raghavan wrote:
On Thu, 9 Mar 2017, at 03:27 PM, Georg Chini wrote:
On 09.03.2017 05:37, Arun Raghavan wrote:
We don't always know whether the in-flight memory chunks will be
rendered or skipped (if the source is not in RUNNING). This can cause us
to have an erroneous
On Thu, 9 Mar 2017, at 03:27 PM, Georg Chini wrote:
> On 09.03.2017 05:37, Arun Raghavan wrote:
> > We don't always know whether the in-flight memory chunks will be
> > rendered or skipped (if the source is not in RUNNING). This can cause us
> > to have an erroneous estimate of drift, particularl
On 09.03.2017 05:37, Arun Raghavan wrote:
We don't always know whether the in-flight memory chunks will be
rendered or skipped (if the source is not in RUNNING). This can cause us
to have an erroneous estimate of drift, particularly when the canceller
starts.
To avoid this, we explicitly flush o